I don't think that Makefile.in should be added
Vincent
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 enlightenment-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : vapier
> Module : e_modules
>
> Dir : e_modules
>
>
> Added Files:
> Makefile.in configure.in
>
>
> Log Message:
> som
I don't think this would be the correct solution. The stringshare's are intended to work as a drop in replacement for strdup/free, which does segv if you pass in NULL. Putting in a check for NULL before the call to stringshare would be more appropriate.
On 12/26/05, Chady Kassouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 26 December 2005 04:07, Vincent Torri wrote:
> I don't think that Makefile.in should be added
you going to elaborate on why ? because with your simple response my answer
is 'you clearly havent read the source, so read it or stfu' ;)
-mike
-
Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
If I understand correctly, this patch was written for Slackware? If so I
can't take it...what we would want is a script that at least covers most
of the major distros (Debian, Mandriva, Fedora, Ubuntu, Gentoo,
Slackware) and understands how each of them stores X sessions.
