Ken Taylor wrote:
> On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Ken Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a
>>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine.
>>> If I may ask two questions...
>>>
>>> Does this version of
good idea,
EPIC release --> rhel release, centOS release
keep the old RPMS when EPIC package upgrade.
no compatibility issue any more.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 17 May 2018 at 18:11, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:36:17PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> I have been worried about a negative feedback loop here on packagers.
>> This is a new technology and packagers aren't usually people who care
>>
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:36:17PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I have been worried about a negative feedback loop here on packagers.
> This is a new technology and packagers aren't usually people who care
> about EPEL. Having them to deal with multiple OS's they don't use
> makes it more
On 17 May 2018 at 15:31, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 03:06:43PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Modules
> [...]
>> EPIC-next
>>
>>The tooling for modules can match how Fedora approaches it. This
>>means that rules for module
On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ken Taylor wrote:
I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a
newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine.
If I may ask two questions...
Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on