Sets already have forEach.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Peter Jaszkowiak
wrote:
> There is already a proposal for this.
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> Yes, please do!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton
For posterity, here's the link: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-set-methods
-
Isiah Meadows
m...@isiahmeadows.com
Looking for web consulting? Or a new website?
Send me an email and we can get started.
www.isiahmeadows.com
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Peter Jaszkowiak
There is already a proposal for this.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller wrote:
> Yes, please do!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton
> wrote:
>
>> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have
>> come
Yes, please do!
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton
wrote:
> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have come
> up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me writing
> up a new proposal for adding the following
I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have come up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me writing up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be useful? I would really like to see this through and would be willing to work for
5 matches
Mail list logo