On 02-Jun-01, Saibal Mitra wrote:
>
> Yes but shouldn't all the ``oppelbrothersisters´´ be identified?
>
> Saibal
I wouldn't think so - since they are ex hypothesi in different
universes. For a good fictionalization of these ideas, read Greg
Egan's novel "Permutation City".
Brent Meeker
"Utop
Bruno wrote:
>
> Saibal wrote: (complete message below for the FORers)
>
> >Can't we prove that stars (and for that matter anything we observe)
exist
> >in at least some universes?
>
> But does "some universes" exists ? To tell you frankly I have a problem
with
> the word "universe". I guess yo
You'll have to ask Bruno, because that's what he wrote.
> On 01-Jun-01, Saibal Mitra wrote:
>
> > BTW, do you know that Godel wrote a formalisation in the modal logic
> > system S5 of St. Anselm proof of the existence of God? (I'm not sure
> > there is any evidence that Godel takes his proof seri
On 01-Jun-01, Saibal Mitra wrote:
> BTW, do you know that Godel wrote a formalisation in the modal logic
> system S5 of St. Anselm proof of the existence of God? (I'm not sure
> there is any evidence that Godel takes his proof seriously, but it is
> a nice little piece of exact and very modest t
gt;> i'm afraid Russell Standish is right here.
>>> If God see stars and if God exists, then indeed stars exists, but
>>> nobody has ever give any evidence for stars or gods. Alas.
>>> (Independently of the question of the existence of Gods, or stars).
>>>
>
f the existence of Gods, or stars).
>>
>> You can only prove (following indeed St. Anselm) that if God exists
>> and if stars exists, then God sees stars.
Charles Goodwin comments:
>Who says there's no evidence for the existence of stars? I for one am a
>convinced stell
6 matches
Mail list logo
