2018-04-14 11:31 GMT+02:00 Martin Vignali :
>
> >
>> > For the proxy chroma version is also the same matrix use in prores_aw
>>
>> Patch is OK then, assumming FATE still passes.
>>
>>
>> Ok thanks for comments.
> It passes fate test for me (but prores_ks have few fate test !)
>
> I will wait few d
> >
> > For the proxy chroma version is also the same matrix use in prores_aw
>
> Patch is OK then, assumming FATE still passes.
>
>
> Ok thanks for comments.
It passes fate test for me (but prores_ks have few fate test !)
I will wait few days, if someone else have comments, before apply.
Martin
On 4/13/18, Martin Vignali wrote:
>> You sure those are actually used in binary?
>>
>>
> luma, chroma matrix in prores is write in each frame.
> So i take these values, from a real sample (prores made with official
> encoder (and for xq, you can also, compare with arri sample footage)
>
> For the
> You sure those are actually used in binary?
>
>
luma, chroma matrix in prores is write in each frame.
So i take these values, from a real sample (prores made with official
encoder (and for xq, you can also, compare with arri sample footage)
For the proxy chroma version is also the same matrix us
On 4/13/18, Martin Vignali wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patch in attach, add support to a separate luma and chroma matrix
> for prores encoding
>
> like proxy and xq codec version, doesn't have the same luma and chroma
> matrix
>
> The official xq luma matrix is not use for now (need to fix something
> els
Hello,
Patch in attach, add support to a separate luma and chroma matrix
for prores encoding
like proxy and xq codec version, doesn't have the same luma and chroma
matrix
The official xq luma matrix is not use for now (need to fix something
elsein the encoder in order to use it
(desaturate the p