[firebird-support] Re: SQLSTATE 28000

2011-10-08 Thread raym...@ymail.com
Hey Thomas, You tip did the trick. I was actually following the steps for create database & thought of putting the user command on the "next line". Thanks, Raymond --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Clarke wrote: > > Raymond, > > To connect through isql the command is: > > c

Re: [firebird-support] creating a database in ubuntu

2011-10-08 Thread Helen Borrie
At 05:27 PM 9/10/2011, you wrote: >OK, > >I use ubuntu lucid ( 10.04 ) >I have got all the way to > >installing and running firebird 2.1 super >installing and running flamerobin > >every time i try to create a database i get this: > >Engine Code: 335544344 >Engine Message : >I/O error for file

[firebird-support] creating a database in ubuntu

2011-10-08 Thread sir_wally_lewis
OK, I use ubuntu lucid ( 10.04 ) I have got all the way to installing and running firebird 2.1 super installing and running flamerobin every time i try to create a database i get this: Engine Code: 335544344 Engine Message : I/O error for file "/opt/data/firebird/blank/blank.fdb" Error whi

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Helen Borrie
At 02:45 PM 9/10/2011, raja_s_patil wrote: >We have decided to tryout IBPhoenix IBreplicator for this. For me also this is >First Kind of Task. We thought that deciding would be Database size is First >Step then checking which RDBMS will support is Next. Now since FB 2.5 seems to >be OK so we w

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread raja_s_patil
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "samcarleton" wrote: > > raja_s_patil, > > Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you > asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world > is a HUGE question and possible show stopper: > > -:> No

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread samcarleton
raja_s_patil, Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world is a HUGE question and possible show stopper: -:> Now Client wants to have centralized database with two way Replication at HO. Hav

Re: [firebird-support] SQLSTATE 28000

2011-10-08 Thread Thomas Clarke
Raymond, To connect through isql the command is: connect ''h:\KKR.FDB' user 'sysdba' password 'masterkey'; You have left out the user name and password. Thomas. On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:07 AM, raym...@ymail.com wrote: > ** > > > Hello, > > This is my first time trying to use Firebird. I am r

[firebird-support] SQLSTATE 28000

2011-10-08 Thread raym...@ymail.com
Hello, This is my first time trying to use Firebird. I am required by a client to write an application that extract data from Firebird. Here is what I have done so far: 1. I copied the .FDB file from my client's live application 2. Installed Firebird 3. Tried to access the database using ISQL: c

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread raja_s_patil
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote: > > Hello, raja_s_patil! > > Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote: > > r> client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized > r> database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 1

Re: [firebird-support] FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
Hello Alexey, >> But for centralized >> database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10 >> to 15 GB > > : > > One of our customers' databases (not the biggest :) - excerpt from daily > report from DataGuard, pay attention to database size > > ==cit===

[firebird-support] Re: Does Firebird expose the db wide 'row version'?

2011-10-08 Thread samcarleton
raja_s_patil, Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world is a HUGE question and possible show stopper: -:> Now Client wants to have centralized database with two way Replication at HO. Hav

Re: [firebird-support] FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Dmitry Kuzmenko
Hello, raja_s_patil! Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote: r> client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized r> database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10 r> to 15 GB and how it will perform and have given indication that they 10-15

Re: [firebird-support] FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Alexey Kovyazin
08.10.2011 9:37, raja_s_patil: > But for centralized > database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10 > to 15 GB : One of our customers' databases (not the biggest :) - excerpt from daily report from DataGuard, pay attention to database size ==ci