[Flexradio] 683 comment

2006-09-20 Thread root [knesbitt]
Paul, I can vouch for the ASUS P5W with the Intel 975X chipset. Not particularly cheap but far superior performance to my previous AMD athlon board. I'm running the P5WD2 with a non-dual core cpu (P-4 HT LGA 775, 3.4 Ghz). It simply purrs along with 683 feeding a Firebox over 1394. CPU load aver

[Flexradio] 683 comment

2006-09-20 Thread Paul Shaffer
My pc doesn't seem to keep up with the new UI features. CPU reading varies a lot, from 50% to 70% generally. Tuning is not responsive as before with mouse wheel, there's a lot more going on as the display changes. Popping (or dropouts) in received audio is very noticable, audio/dsp buffers at 1024/

[Flexradio] Front panel rf-af

2006-09-20 Thread Paul Shaffer
The "rf" control is new and not covered the manual. What is the difference between rf and af in receive mode? ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http:/

Re: [Flexradio] missing DLL

2006-09-20 Thread Tim Ellison
se City, Mich. 49686 231.941.5591 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/db71ffcf/attach ment.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image

[Flexradio] missing DLL

2006-09-20 Thread Tom Shikoski
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/db71ffcf/attachment.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 13107 bytes Desc: not available Url : /piper

[Flexradio] SVN Upgrading - PLL options

2006-09-20 Thread Kevin Hobbs
Hi All; I installed the Tortoise SVN ... everything worked fine ... the dual RX is really neat. When the new software version ran the first time I had to tell it all about my SDR configuration again ... when it got to asking me about my PLL, it only had options for 10 and 20 MHz ... not that it m

Re: [Flexradio] SVN 683 Installation Problems

2006-09-20 Thread Tim Ellison
Lack of sunspots :-) It is hard to say. Windows can be funny (strange) like that sometimes. -Tim --- Tim Ellison Integrated Technical Services -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jim.k0mhc Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:32 PM To: fle

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?

2006-09-20 Thread Robert McGwier
When I chose split, and I pressed the MOX button, the frequency across the grid did not change and the power spectrum for the transmitted voice had carrier at zero frequency. Either we change the frequency readings across the top (which are incorrect when the MOX button is pushed and we ar

[Flexradio] SVN 683 Installation Problems

2006-09-20 Thread jim.k0mhc
Fatal Error "Unable to find an entry point named SetRxListen in DLL DttSP.dll" No, I didn't have the SDR operating when I updated via Tortoise and It's always updated to the latest SVN before. What's different (in the SVN update process) this time?? 73, Jim

[Flexradio] Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread w8ikn
: /pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/13f49845/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

2006-09-20 Thread Eric Wachsmann
Dave, This reminded me of something. You won't get good audio output if you have something plugged into both the Line Out and the headphone output on the MP3+. This will load down the output and you'll get very little drive out of the radio. Perhaps this was the issue? Eric Wachsmann FlexRadi

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

2006-09-20 Thread Willi Reppel
Dave Make sure that the volume control on your MP3+ is turned to position "max" to get output from the transmitter. vy 73 de SM6OMH Willi - Original Message - From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Philip M. Lanese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?

2006-09-20 Thread Eric Wachsmann
Split mode is working as best as I can tell. There was a problem with Split + XIT that will be fixed in SVN 684, but other than this, I could not find a problem. It will still show up near the 0 Hz line. Perhaps that is throwing some people off. Eric Wachsmann FlexRadio Systems > -Origina

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Jerald Jones
Thanks, Bob Ken and John, I am not used to useing the B vfo and had it sitting off on another band. It worked just fine once I received your infromation. I will now give it a test and see how it opens up the world. Thanks, Jerry WK0J - Original Message - From: "Bob McGwie

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Bob McGwier
Jerald: Hover over the VFOb numbers (on the right at the top of the display) and use the mouse wheel to tune both VFO's to exactly the same frequency. Then hover over the 100 Hz position and mouse wheel up and down. You should see the "green box" for the subRX move around with respect to th

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Jerald Jones
Regarding the 683 Sub RX , I seem to have no way to tune the sub receiver. The pan controls work fine but I do not have the slightest idea how to view the freq of more than one receiver or to tune more than one receiver. Also the Vox has not worked in any of the versions. Perhaps the reason is

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

2006-09-20 Thread David Ackrill
That's a relief then. The only time it really mattered, for me, was Red on the Right at the Rear. Which indicated that the Red phase went to the right hand lug of an 11kV triff box as you looked at it from the back of the switchgear... That was before the IEE and the EU standards people got in

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?

2006-09-20 Thread John Sweeney
What is not working properly just yet on the split? Seemed to work okay, but not so sure. Im not at the SDR-1000 now to test. John, N3WT Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with > some compromises. Split i

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

2006-09-20 Thread Allen Boehm
I second the motion! On 9/20/06 12:40 PM, "Tim Ellison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My vote is to expend the programming effort on the new console and only > consider the Multi-RX enhancements that are "low hanging fruit" for > inclusion in the 1.x console. > > > > > -Tim > --- > Integrated

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

2006-09-20 Thread Philip M. Lanese
David Since there are only two wires, I only have to dedicate two of the fast deteriorating synapses to remember 'R'ed 'R'ing. Phil, K3IB - Original Message - From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:27 PM Subject: [Flexradio] Which way round?

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

2006-09-20 Thread Tim Ellison
My vote is to expend the programming effort on the new console and only consider the Multi-RX enhancements that are "low hanging fruit" for inclusion in the 1.x console. -Tim --- Integrated Technical Services "Too much of everything is just enough." -Rob Barlow -Original Message- Fro

[Flexradio] Which way round?

2006-09-20 Thread David Ackrill
Whilst my SDR1000 is away being repaired, I have been looking at the connections between the Soundblaster MP3+ and the radio. Line in when to line in and line out to line out, so that's OK, but checking the red and white connectors shows that the red is connected to the ring (middle connection)

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

2006-09-20 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI
Understandable Eric. I'm really happy to have what's there now! I doubt I would use cross mode dual rx that often anyway. Thanks Again Brian w5ami On 9/20/06, Eric Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to > implement thanks to

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

2006-09-20 Thread Eric Wachsmann
The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG time ago!). However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual modes/filters/other settings. And to add them would be a fair amount of work. I'll be hone

[Flexradio] Feature Request List

2006-09-20 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI
I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request" system. Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request list. I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure. Being a programmer myself, I

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Bob McGwier
What he said! Jim Lux wrote: >At 06:36 AM 9/20/2006, Robert McGwier wrote: > > >>I believe that Peter has probably hit on the correct interpretation. If >>so (and I will test this today) and TortoiseSVN is NOT giving a "cannot >>write" error message, this is a bug since this cannot be allowed

Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question

2006-09-20 Thread Eric Wachsmann
It believe it is just a zip of the binary files as opposed to a complete installer (similar to SVN) if that is what you were asking. Eric Wachsmann FlexRadio Systems > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders > Sent:

Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question

2006-09-20 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI
Jerry, If you need to pick and choose which dll, etc. to update, you need to use Tortoise instead. The zip contain the entire system, less the database. You can unzip the entire thing into an empty directory and then import or copy your db there. Brian w5ami On 9/20/06, Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Jim Lux
At 06:36 AM 9/20/2006, Robert McGwier wrote: >I believe that Peter has probably hit on the correct interpretation. If >so (and I will test this today) and TortoiseSVN is NOT giving a "cannot >write" error message, this is a bug since this cannot be allowed to happen. > >Windows locks dll's that a

Re: [Flexradio] "How do I get SVN: 683".....

2006-09-20 Thread Ken - N9VV
Use TortoiseSVN and get the latest FULL BINARY DISTRIBUTION at anytime you like: http://www.flex-radio.com/download_files/PowerSDR/Docs/TortoiseSVN.pdf Toward the bottom of the document, you will see the link for the BINARY distribution. Use an empty subdirectory. Copy and paste that into Torto

[Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Dave Muskopf
I can't get 683 to load. It says "SetRXListen in DLL Dttsp.dll" can't be found or something like that. What do I do? And where are these DLL files? W8XO ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/fle

Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question

2006-09-20 Thread Jerry Flanders
Is this a complete distribution package for this experimental version? If not, how do I use it to enhance an existing install? I apologize if I missed any earlier discussion on this topic. Jerry W4UK At 08:20 9/20/2006, A.R.S. - W5AMI wrote: >To all non-Tortoise users ;) > >I have zipped SVN 6

Re: [Flexradio] spam: Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Frank Brickle
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 09:48 -0400, Philip Covington wrote: > I didn't know there was a Linux version of PowerSDR Console! :-) There isn't. There are several varieties of Linux consoles. Quad RX has been around in G3UKB's Python version for well over a year, though, I think. 73 Frank AB2KT

Re: [Flexradio] spam: Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Philip Covington
I didn't know there was a Linux version of PowerSDR Console! :-) 73 de Phil N8VB On 9/19/06, Frank Brickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah. It's been in the Linux version forever ;-) > > 73 > Frank > AB2KT > > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:12 -0400, Philip Covington wrote: > > Yeah, kinda like déjà

Re: [Flexradio] SVN683

2006-09-20 Thread Robert McGwier
The brute force method I use is to simply delete the files and do an update. The fact that these files are SUPPOSED to be there is stored in a "hidden" directory .svn in each subdirectory of our SVN tree. They will be replaced. Bob N4HY Jim, W4ATK wrote: > Wow! It took a moment for this se

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Robert McGwier
I believe that Peter has probably hit on the correct interpretation. If so (and I will test this today) and TortoiseSVN is NOT giving a "cannot write" error message, this is a bug since this cannot be allowed to happen. Windows locks dll's that are in use and refuses to allow them to be overw

Re: [Flexradio] spam: Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Robert McGwier
Phil's SDRconsole was the first to support split receivers for Windows. The differences in this implementation is it makes use of the DttSP facility which has been in the dsp code since the official 1.0 release including panning control.The second receiver is under VFO-B control that is

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

2006-09-20 Thread Robert McGwier
Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with some compromises. Split is not working properly just yet. From my read of the code, this should be easy for Eric to get done. Bob N4HY N3WT wrote: > The dual RX is great! Thank you to the team and individuals workin

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Tim Ellison
Chas, >From the date stamps, you can tell what files were downloaded/updated and which ones were not. Delete the files with the older date stamp and re-download SVN. SVN will realize you have removed files and replace them. -Tim --- Integrated Technical Services "Too much of everything is ju

[Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Charles Greene
Hello, I atempted to download SVN683 this morning and got error messages on two .dlls. Evidently it didn't download them as they were in use. I was running SVN 682 at the time. The program says it is SVN 683, but it isn't, and when I try to update SVN, it won't; says it is SVN 683, as the t

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Dave Kiefer
Pete, No, PowerSDR was not running. I always do the update before I start it for the day. I agree, if they are in use they won't be overwritten, so I don't have it running, and I usually am starting it from a clean boot. Dave - N4DWK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If the files in question are dlls,

Re: [Flexradio] Digital transceiver

2006-09-20 Thread Charles Greene
Jim, Tnx for reply. I downloaded SVN 683 this morning, and it does the same thing. It's easy enough to unclick Tune, which ends it. Chas At 09:37 AM 9/19/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote: >Hi Charles, > > I noticed the same thing here and dropped back to 677. When > I switch to >by-pass to use

[Flexradio] SVN683

2006-09-20 Thread Jim, W4ATK
Wow! It took a moment for this senior citizen to work it all out, but what an enhancement. FWIW, I create new directories for each SVN and then simply import the DB. It works great here. Everything updates cleanly. Very Cool! Take that KenSu! Jim, W4ATK

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Thompson_Peter
If the files in question are dlls, I would guess that they were in use (loaded) at the time you attempted to do the svn update; svn would be unable to delete the old version as part of the replacement operation. Was PowerSDR running at that time? Pete, N3EVL > -Original Message- > From:

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread Klaus Lohmann
listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/d

[Flexradio] 683 Zip Download

2006-09-20 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI
To all non-Tortoise users ;) I have zipped SVN 683 and it is ready for download at: http://w5ami.net/683.zip This is the SVN that contain the new sub RX feature. Really cool stuff! Brian w5ami ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

2006-09-20 Thread EB4APL
Dave Kiefer wrote: > I have a question for the brain trust. > > I updated to SVN:683 and Power SDR would not start up > after that, telling me something about not being able to insert > receive frequency or something into DttSP.dll. Upon further > investigation,I found that file and 5 others that