David Megginson wrote:
> James Turner writes:
> > Certainly this point needs to be emphasized, otherwise there will
> > be a situation where someone moves some code from using non-tied to
> > tied props (for whatever reason) and the behavior of every system
> > that depends on those propertie
James Turner writes:
> > 2. If a property has been added or removed, it is the property's
> >parent.
>
> Hmm, how is the listener meant to work this out? Seems like you'd
> be better with a bigger interface (change / add_child / rmv_child)
> and default { } impls so people can ignore c
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, at 02:38 am, David Megginson wrote:
>
> The node argument is as follows:
>
> 1. If the value of an existing property node has been modified, it is
>the node itself.
>
> 2. If a property has been added or removed, it is the property's
>parent.
Hmm, how is the l
