On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> * 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics IE.
> stalls, spins and compressibility/transonic effects (if the
> aircraft can reach transonic speeds).
Darn, I did go to great lengths to develop a flight
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 01:28:39 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> >> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it
> >> took all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings f
Hello,
> > Thanks for the poke. I completely forgot to write this
> up.
> >
> > I'll try to do this today, though it needs a proper
> name.
> This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article
> completely with
> the rating system described in December.
> Now I'm off to rate all the aircraf
Le 25/05/2011 22:28, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with
> the rating system described in December.
>
> Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I maintain!
>
> -Stuart
Hehe, nice to see that a rating system may have a chance to be establis
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
>> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took
>> all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that
>> get scored and then create the entries in th
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took
> all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that
> get scored and then create the entries in the *set.xml file. The system is
> easy to use an
6 matches
Mail list logo
