On Monday, May 30, 2011 12:47:41 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> >> I don't have a good answer for the other items. Some are nice-to-haves
> >> that enrich
> >> the simulation experience but don't impact simulation of flight
> >> itself, but others
> >> (such as a co-pilot) are more important for multi
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Stuart
>
>>
>> > Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
>> > channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points
>> remain:
>> >
>> > There is no penalty for including systems, such as an AP, whe
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:31:13 AM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vivian Meazz awrote:
> > Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
> > channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points
> > remain:
> >
> > There is no pe
Stuart
>
> > Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
> > channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points
> remain:
> >
> > There is no penalty for including systems, such as an AP, where none
> existed
> > on the original.
>
> There's not an exp
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vivian Meazz awrote:
> Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
> channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points remain:
>
> There is no penalty for including systems, such as an AP, where none existed
> on the orig
5 matches
Mail list logo
