On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:28, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I just finished some initial experiments in loading the Robin Peel airway
> database for flightgear. The code is based on the ground network code that
> I wrote for AI taxiway following. While I have stuff working right now, one
>
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 12:25, Jon Stockill wrote:
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > I agree, but for display purposes just loading a memory image of the
> > Robin Peel database would probably suffice. I.e. there wouldn't be a need
> > for setting up an intricate network of nodes and connections as I'
Durk Talsma wrote:
I agree, but for display purposes just loading a memory image of the Robin
Peel database would probably suffice. I.e. there wouldn't be a need for
setting up an intricate network of nodes and connections as I'm currently
doing for the ground network. Therefore, I'm consideri
On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:34, Josh Babcock wrote:
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering though if there would be any future need for airway
> > information inside FlightGear itself, for example in modeling GPS
> > receivers or flight management computers. If so, it would still be
> > worthw
Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I just finished some initial experiments in loading the Robin Peel airway
> database for flightgear. The code is based on the ground network code that I
> wrote for AI taxiway following. While I have stuff working right now, one
> major problem is becoming app
Hi Folks,
I just finished some initial experiments in loading the Robin Peel airway
database for flightgear. The code is based on the ground network code that I
wrote for AI taxiway following. While I have stuff working right now, one
major problem is becoming apparent: It takes approximately 6
6 matches
Mail list logo
