2006/9/11, Jeremias Maerki:
As mentioned last month, I just changed the property names a little bit.
If anyone finds these inappropriate, please yell.
This is not a big deal, but the names bother me a bit. Reading
widow-content-limit makes me believe that that corresponds to the
maximum
Hi Simon,
I finally took the time to read and digest your Wiki page. This is an
interesting reading. A few comments:
According to that representation paragraphs with inline text have
legal linebreak points. I consider those legal linebreak points also
as legal pagebreak points. In addition,
Jeremias,
What is the problem you are trying to address:
1. Users use configuration files with errors which can be detected by
the fop-configuration schema, but they do not validate it.
2. Users use configuration files with errors which cannot be detected
by the fop-configuration schema.
Fair enough. Can I get a couple of other opinions? I don't mind changing
the names. I just want to make sure we choose a good one. Thanks!
On 12.09.2006 17:32:57 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
2006/9/11, Jeremias Maerki:
As mentioned last month, I just changed the property names a little bit.
If
On 12.09.2006 21:13:35 Simon Pepping wrote:
Jeremias,
What is the problem you are trying to address:
1. Users use configuration files with errors which can be detected by
the fop-configuration schema, but they do not validate it.
2. Users use configuration files with errors which
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
