DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49870] Border-right not visible if hyphenation is activated

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49870 Matthias Reischenbacher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthias8...@gmx.at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49870] New: Border-right not visible if hyphenation is activated

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49870 Summary: Border-right not visible if hyphenation is activated Product: Fop Version: 1.0 Platform: PC Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: pdf

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
On 02.09.2010 12:14, Glenn Adams wrote: also the doclet options to permit use of @todo without warnings. I could try to experiment some to see if that is feasible, then we could return to the former usage of @todo. Javadoc 1.5 or later can be passed a command line option defining additional to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46360] Thread-safety issue rendering SVG

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 --- Comment #7 from Alexis Giotis 2010-09-02 07:52:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25970) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25970) Patch to clone the SVG document inside PDFImageHandlerSVG The patch is attach

Re: Is org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory thread safe ?

2010-09-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Alexis Thanks for the patch! I'll look at it shortly. Would you mind attaching it to the Bugzilla issue? https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 That way it's clearer that you donate the changes to the ASF and everything concerning this problem is in one place. Thanks! On 02.

Re: Is org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory thread safe ?

2010-09-02 Thread Alexios Giotis
Jeremias, thanks for the clarification about the FopFactory. I had a look at your old commit at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=724163 The current situation in trunk is that in PDFImageHandlerSVG.handleImage() the SVG document is not cloned but in other places it is. Exampl

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-02 Thread Glenn Adams
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm not sure we have the tooling to make sure noone > uses @todo. > Actually, checkstyle 5.1 will report warnings for any use of a non-standard tag that is not qualified with a dotted prefix. Also the standard Doclet in recent JDKs will com

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Just to add my 0.05 CHF: I normally use @todo when adding TODOs as part of a method or class comment and I use //TODO inline. That's because plain "TODO" lets the full text bleed into the Javadocs which is certainly something we don't want. See for example: org.apache.fop.area.DestinationData.resol

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46360] Thread-safety issue rendering SVG

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 --- Comment #6 from Alexis Giotis 2010-09-02 05:01:10 EDT --- I can confirm that this issue is valid for FOP 1.0. A workaround is to use a different instance of FopFactory per thread. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzi

Re: Is org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory thread safe ?

2010-09-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Peter could be right. And there I thought I had this under control. But with so many open Bugzilla issues, things get lost quickly. I've seen multi-threading issues inside Batik myself in a production system and haven't been able to put my finger on it since I though I had this fixed, but it could

Re: Is org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory thread safe ?

2010-09-02 Thread Alexios Giotis
Hi Peter, Thanks for pointing this out. It differs in that the instance of FOUserAgent was shared, but other than this, it's exactly the same case. Finally, this leads to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 which is still open. As I read from the thread, this is a compl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49681] Upgrade Exceptions from fop 0.95 to 1.o

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49681 --- Comment #6 from Jeremias Maerki 2010-09-02 03:36:12 EDT --- Should have thought about it earlier. We're talking about TIFF export, so another work-around: Install JAI ImageIO Tools to give ImageIO a TIFF codec which it hasn't by defaul

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49681] Upgrade Exceptions from fop 0.95 to 1.o

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49681 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from Jer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49681] Upgrade Exceptions from fop 0.95 to 1.o

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49681 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Version|0.95|1.0 --- Comment #4 from Jeremias

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49727] Upgrade exceptions from fop 0.95 to fop 1.0 (generate tiff output)

2010-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49727 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|