work with the newer batik.
Thanks
*From:*Dean Nelson
*Sent:* 26 March 2019 16:38
*To:* fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
*Subject:* RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
All,
It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version that could be used with
2.3. Right now I am stuck with FOP 2.2 because of this change.
Hi,
The developer of JEuclid will need to be contacted to update their code to work
with the newer batik.
Thanks
From: Dean Nelson
Sent: 26 March 2019 16:38
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
All,
It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version
/jeuclid ?
Regards,
Dean Nelson
From: Simon Steiner
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:32 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
Hi,
In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the namespace
since we don’t own org.w3c.
https://issues.apache.org
Hi,
In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the namespace
since we don’t own org.w3c.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1216
Thanks
From: Maxime Bégnis
Sent: 26 March 2019 08:21
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
He