sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-31 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html -- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-31 Thread Peter Wemm
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-12-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

FreeBSD 5.0-RC2/sparc64 now available

2002-12-31 Thread Scott Long
All, Thanks to help from Jake Burkholder and Anders Norby, FreeBSD 5.0-RC2/sparc64 was finally finished and should be available from most of the ftp sites now in both ISO and ftp formats. There is about a week to go until RC3 is scheduled to be cut, so please test this and the other arch's if

Re: 5.0 devfs_lookupx panic w/dec 19 kernel

2002-12-31 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > Other than background fsck, there was only a single console login, a > copy of screen, and a single outbound SSH. No X or anything else running. I only sent the email 5 minutes ago, and already two people have corrected me :) The distributed.net client

Re: witness: could sleep with "dc0" locked

2002-12-31 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, ryan beasley wrote: > > Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to > > tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the > > road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally

5.0 devfs_lookupx panic w/dec 19 kernel

2002-12-31 Thread Gavin Atkinson
Hi, I don't think this will be of any use - i could not get a dump - but my system just panicked. background fsck was in progress. Here is the panic and backtrace: Dec 31 20:50:59 epsilon kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Dec 31 20:50:59 epsilon kernel: fault virtual address

Re: witness: could sleep with "dc0" locked

2002-12-31 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, ryan beasley wrote: > Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to > tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the > road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has a reason to > complain, right? :).) M

RE: buildworld failure

2002-12-31 Thread Roderick van Domburg
> > > Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. > > > Didn't matter whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P. > > > > Try "cvs co -P". > > No, -Pd. A simple -P seemed to work, thanks! I'm kind of new to this CVS stuff. Hope you will succeed in Modula-3 ported to sparc64

Re: buildworld failure

2002-12-31 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-12-31 ] [ Subjecte: Re: buildworld failure ] > On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > > Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter > > whether I used cvs update with -P or wi

Re: buildworld failure

2002-12-31 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter > whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P. Try "cvs co -P". > Got the following error during cleaning: > > ===> usr.sbin/fwcontrol > cd: can

buildworld failure

2002-12-31 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P. Got the following error during cleaning: ===> usr.sbin/fwcontrol cd: can't cd to /usr/src/usr.sbin/fwcontrol *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin. *** Error code 1 S

Solved: 5.0-RC2 netstat -i

2002-12-31 Thread Kim Culhan
Built and installed a new kernel, problem went away. tnx -kim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Slightly OT: Reasons to upgrade?

2002-12-31 Thread Joe Laughlin
Currently, I"m running STABLE on my machine, which serves as both a desktop and a server. It seems to work great and everything. Does everything I need it to do. Is there any compelling reason for me to upgrade to 5.0 next year? I've read over the list of anticipated new features and there's

witness: could sleep with "dc0" locked

2002-12-31 Thread ryan beasley
Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has a reason to complain, right? :).) Sources from HEAD around 04:15 -0600 today. I

5.0-RC2 netstat -i gives incorrect network IP's

2002-12-31 Thread Kim Culhan
This is 5.0-RC2 from 3 days ago: NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs Coll fxp0 1500 00:90:27:91:4f:ad 228 0 337 0 0 fxp0 1500 192.58.161.22 honker 238 - 343 - - fxp0 1500 fe80:1

Re: buildworld fails building boot2

2002-12-31 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:33:15 -0500 Matt Emmerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just cvsup'd the latest -CURRENT sources (8 hours ago) and I'm having trouble >doing a buildworld. cvsup again, I just build world and it works :) flynn@christine# uname -a FreeBSD christine.energyhq.tk 5.0-CURRENT

buildworld fails building boot2

2002-12-31 Thread Matt Emmerton
I just cvsup'd the latest -CURRENT sources (8 hours ago) and I'm having trouble doing a buildworld. Specifically, I get this: ===> sys/boot/i386/boot2 btxld -v -E 0x2000 -f bin -b /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/btx/btx -l boot2.ldr -o boot2.ld -P 1 boot2.bin kernel: ver=1.01 size=7

Re: XFree86 4.2.99.3 on -CURRENT

2002-12-31 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote: > On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:30, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > Hmmm. I have the same version of X as you (roughly, the tag was already > > in place by the time I built although I always use HEAD, I built on 23rd > > December) and FreeBSD i

Re: XFree86 4.2.99.3 on -CURRENT

2002-12-31 Thread Frode Nordahl
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:30, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > Hmmm. I have the same version of X as you (roughly, the tag was already > in place by the time I built although I always use HEAD, I built on 23rd > December) and FreeBSD is from 25th December. I just updated the sources to HEAD, and I see ch

Re: XFree86 4.2.99.3 on -CURRENT

2002-12-31 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello, On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:09:28AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone had any success with this combo? Yes. Apart from the known problem with my S3 Virge GX2 graphics adapter, which causes random freezes under X when only the reset button helps. But this has been happenin

XFree86 4.2.99.3 on -CURRENT

2002-12-31 Thread Frode Nordahl
Hello, Has anyone had any success with this combo? It compiles fine, but the X server aborts due to bus error (SIGBUS) generated by something in xf86GetPciBridgeInfo() (xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c) Running -CURRENT (World/kernel) as of December 29. XFree86 sources as of

Re: My wi(4) ate itself (or Fun with no memory).

2002-12-31 Thread Ants Aader
I have had almost exactly same problems about year ago. Orinoco silver stopped two times after 25 - 28 day working with freebsd current under somewhat strong load. Even after reboot it didn't work anymore. I burned two times new firmware and the card started to wor