On Thursday 27 November 2003 10:43, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 19:37, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> > flushing 4 dirty blocks.
> >
> > I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 a.d., Bruce Evans wrote:
> > This is a known problem for nearly three months now (See PR 56675). It
> > happens to me every time I shut down the system if i don't unmount my
> > (read-only) ext2 file systems manually.
>
> I'm not sure if the problem is known for the read-only
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 19:37, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> > flushing 4 dirty blocks.
> >
> > I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one
> ext2
> >
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 19:37, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one
ext2
> file system on another ATA drive and one ext2 file system
Ryan Sommers wrote:
I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was
about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every
other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing.
Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus
prot
I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was
about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every
other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing.
Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus protection"?
Could this b
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:37, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one ext2
> file system on another ATA drive and one ext2 file s
In a message written on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:52:04AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> > flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> This is easy to reproduce, but apparently uninteresting to the developers:
>
>
"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:37:45 +0100
>> From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
>> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>>
>> I had three UFS
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kevin Oberman" writes:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:37:45 +0100
>> From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
>> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>>
>> I ha
Matthias Andree wrote:
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
This is easy to reproduce, but apparently uninteresting to the developers:
Reboot to single user, run full fsck, halt.
--
:{ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Farkas
Sy
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:37:45 +0100
> From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one ex
Hi,
when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
flushing 4 dirty blocks.
I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one ext2
file system on another ATA drive and one ext2 file system on a SCSI
drive. Both ext2 file systems had been mounted read-onl
13 matches
Mail list logo
