On 5/14/2012 12:02 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Uli - amazed that a change to a document that apparently no one is
> reading can cause such a fuss.
... which is the point that several of us tried to make, and which you
seem to have ignored. The problem with committers not reading the
documentati
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:35:59 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> When you proposed these changes not only did I not see a consensus for
> you to move forward, I saw a non-zero number of people push back.
>
> Why did you proceed?
- I had a non-zero number of people tell me that it looked good.
- Peter d
When you proposed these changes not only did I not see a consensus for
you to move forward, I saw a non-zero number of people push back.
Why did you proceed?
Doug
On 5/11/2012 9:08 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Author: uqs
> Date: Fri May 11 16:08:51 2012
> New Revision: 235275
> URL: http://sv