Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 01:35:27PM +, Nick Sayer wrote: > Ah! I found it! > > --- linux_ioctl.h.orig Mon Feb 28 11:50:23 2000 > +++ linux_ioctl.h Mon Feb 28 11:24:08 2000 > @@ -32,6 +32,25 @@ > #define_LINUX_IOCTL_H_ This patch is fubar'ed. Your mailer wrapped lines and tur

Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread Nick Sayer
Ah! I found it! --- linux_ioctl.h.orig Mon Feb 28 11:50:23 2000 +++ linux_ioctl.h Mon Feb 28 11:24:08 2000 @@ -32,6 +32,25 @@ #define_LINUX_IOCTL_H_ /* + * disk + */ +#define LINUX_BLKROSET 0x125d +#define LINUX_BLKROGET 0x125e +#define LINUX_BLKRRPART

Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread Nick Sayer
Andrew Atrens wrote: > > A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 - > > > linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented I implemented this ioctl. It's not as hard as you think. You do a DIOCGDINFO and return d_secperunit. But unfortunately, when I did this, a wa

Re: VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-05 Thread Tatsumi Hosokawa
At Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:32:39 -0500 (EST), Andrew Atrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 - > > > linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented > > > After rummaging around in the 2.3 kernel, I found the following in > `linu

VMWare 2.0R broken - linux ioctl(13, 1260, *) not implemented

2000-03-04 Thread Andrew Atrens
A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 - > linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented After rummaging around in the 2.3 kernel, I found the following in `linux/include/linux/fs.h': /* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is