09.02.2011 17:56, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
[skipped]
DST is IPv6 address, IFP and IFA I don't care and GATEWAY section is empty.
Let's see why:
$1 = {sdl_len = 54 '6', sdl_family = 18 '\022', sdl_index = 8, sdl_type
= 135 '\207', sdl_nlen = 0 '\0',
sdl_alen = 0 '\0', sdl_slen = 0 '\0', sdl_data =
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi,
It works for me in the lab and on one production machine I patched early this
morning.
I just MFCed this to 7-STABLE. So if you update your trees make sure
you have rev. 1.332.2.3 of ip_input.c.
/bz
Index: sys/netinet/ip_input.c
Works for me on test machine.. I was expecting a performance increase,
but nothing changed.. Just no more route messages, zebra will be happy.
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi,
Index: sys/netinet/ip_input.c
=
At 09:51 AM 7/2/2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Andre, could you review this?
Yes, this should fix the problem. I haven't tested the patch though.
It works for me in the lab and on one production machine I patched
early this morning.
---Mike
--
Andre
Index: sys/netinet/ip_input.
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi,
Index: sys/netinet/ip_input.c
===
RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c,v
retrieving revision 1.332.2.2
diff -u -p -r1.332.2.2 ip_input.c
--- sys/netinet/ip_in
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the issue goes away.
Ha,
At 05:24 AM 7/1/2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the i
At 05:24 AM 7/1/2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
So I had a very quick look at the code between doing something else.
I think the only change needed is this if I am not mistaken but my
head is far away nowhere close enough in this code.
Hi,
The patch seems to work in that there is not an RT
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the issue goes away.
Ha, I finally know why I e
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the issue goes away.
Ha, I finally know why I ended up on Cc: of a thread I had no idea
about. S
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the issue goes away.
Yes, this change doesn't look right. It should only do the route
lookup in ip_input.c when there was an EMSGSIZE error retur
At 02:26 AM 7/1/2008, Paul wrote:
Turning on / off fastforwarding has no effect for me. I still get
the messages.
I also get major ticks of 'destinations found unreachable' in netstat -rs
if you use
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c?rev=1.332.2.1;con
Turning on / off fastforwarding has no effect for me. I still get the
messages.
I also get major ticks of 'destinations found unreachable' in netstat -rs
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:34 PM 6/27/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:16:17 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wr
At 10:34 PM 6/27/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:16:17 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
>Paul wrote:
>> Get these with GRE tunnel on
>> FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #5: Sun May 11 19:00:57 EDT
>> 2008 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER amd64
>> But do n
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:16:17 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
>Paul wrote:
>> Get these with GRE tunnel on
>> FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #5: Sun May 11 19:00:57 EDT
>> 2008 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER amd64
>> But do not get them with 7.0-RELEASE
>>
>> Any ideas what
2574 output packets discarded due to no route
2904 output datagrams fragmented
5808 fragments created
not incrementing..
route monitor:
got message of size 160 on Tue Jun 24 10:59:04 2008
RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 160, pid: 0, seq 0, errno
0, flags:
lo
Yes but I DO have a default route.. I tried putting one in, removing it,
putting it back, rebooting..
The problem is ZEBRA listens to the socket and uses 10-15% cpu because
of these messages..
It doesn't happen on -RELEASE though so h.. I guess I could hack it
to skip over the reporting of
Paul wrote:
Get these with GRE tunnel on
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #5: Sun May 11 19:00:57 EDT
2008 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER amd64
But do not get them with 7.0-RELEASE
Any ideas what changed? :) Wish there was some sort of changelog..
# of messages per second seems consis
18 matches
Mail list logo