On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>>> Hi virtualbox users!
>>>
>>> This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
>>> VirtualBox 4.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> Hi virtualbox users!
>>
>> This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
>> VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. If you already run VirtualBox 4.2.0 you
>> shou
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi virtualbox users!
>
> This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
> VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. If you already run VirtualBox 4.2.0 you
> should definitely update to 4.2.4 because they fixed quite a few
Hello,
2012/10/30 Bernhard Fröhlich :
> This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
> VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree.
Better Windows 8 support : check.
My other VMs still work as before.
Thanks for your work !
--
Olivier Smedts
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Mike Jakubik
wrote:
> On 2012-10-30 08:07 PM, Jason Andresen wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2012, at 15:56, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>>
>>> Clang does not support global registered variables so it's not supposed
>>> to
>>> work.
>>
>>
>> Is this a feature? Is there a re
On 2012-10-30 08:07 PM, Jason Andresen wrote:
On Oct 30, 2012, at 15:56, Bernhard Fröhlich
wrote:
Clang does not support global registered variables so it's not
supposed to
work.
Is this a feature? Is there a reason why clang couldn't be updated
to support this if actual software is using
On Oct 30, 2012, at 15:56, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> Clang does not support global registered variables so it's not supposed to
> work.
Is this a feature? Is there a reason why clang couldn't be updated to support
this if actual software is using it?
__
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mike Jakubik
wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 4:05:06 PM Mike Jakubik wrote:
>> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
>> >
>> > > Hello, i have just tried to compile this on an up to da
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 4:05:06 PM Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
> >
> > > Hello, i have just tried to compile this on an up to date releng9
> > > system.
> > >
> > > - Base GCC, compiles o
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 4:44:51 PM Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
> I am sorry for confusion. But saying gcc from ports tree I meant some
> day when gcc will be removed from base system. Until it happens (and
> it will probably not at least in FreeBSD10) VirtualBox will be
> compiled with gcc 4.2 fro
2012/10/31 Mike Jakubik :
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 4:24:24 PM Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
>> 2012/10/31 Mike Jakubik :
>> > On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
>> >
>> > My understanding is that Clang will be the defaul
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 4:24:24 PM Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
> 2012/10/31 Mike Jakubik :
> > On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
> >
> > My understanding is that Clang will be the default compiler in FreeBSD
> > 10, ho
2012/10/31 Mike Jakubik :
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
>> > Hello, i have just tried to compile this on an up to date releng9 system.
>> >
>> > - Base GCC, compiles ok, works ok.
>> >
>> > - GCC47, fails, due to ug
On 30 October 2012 20:05, Mike Jakubik
wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
>> > Hello, i have just tried to compile this on an up to date releng9 system.
>> >
>> > - Base GCC, compiles ok, works ok.
>> >
>> > - GC
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 3:56:29 PM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
> > Hello, i have just tried to compile this on an up to date releng9 system.
> >
> > - Base GCC, compiles ok, works ok.
> >
> > - GCC47, fails, due to ugly -fno-format-extensions and
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Mike Jakubik
wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 5:16:14 AM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> Hi virtualbox users!
>>
>> This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
>> VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. If you already run VirtualBox 4.2.0 you
>>
Hi!
I compiled 4.2.4 on a generic 9.0-RELEASE amd64. It compiled and
started, thank you very much!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 5:16:14 AM Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi virtualbox users!
>
> This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
> VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. If you already run VirtualBox 4.2.0 you
> should definitely update to 4.2.4 because they fixed quite a
Hi virtualbox users!
This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. If you already run VirtualBox 4.2.0 you
should definitely update to 4.2.4 because they fixed quite a few serious
bugs upstream.
Our plan is still to commit 4.2 to the ports
19 matches
Mail list logo
