Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
>>>
>>
>> steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
>>
>> And, 4BSD works.
>
> I meant it as a
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:39:00AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
> >>
> >
> > steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
> >
> > And, 4BSD works.
>
> I me
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
>>
>
> steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
>
> And, 4BSD works.
I meant it as a more general observation.
If something doesn't work as needed, consid
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
>
steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
And, 4BSD works.
--
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
thanks,
Adrian
On 7 July 2011 05:00, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
O
* Todor Dragnev [2011-07-06 10:43:17 +0300]:
Inline reply:
>
> Hi Chris
>
> I just installed ZFS on ROOT on two 1TB SATA disks:
>
> First you need to download freebsd 8.2 memstick release
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
I did this via VirtualBox first, so the livefs i
On 7/6/11, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I use SCHED_UL
On 07/06/11 13:00, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl w
rites:
I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
last three years. Nothing has changed.
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
b
On 06/07/2011 17:40, n dhert wrote:
> p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1 and p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1 conflict
> both telling that the other one should be deleted.
> So which one of the two to keep
> so far, I opted for keeping p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1, deleting
> p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1, is thi
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
>> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
>> back to the old SCHED_4B
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>
> >> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> >> better on multicor
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl
> w
> rites:
>
> >I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
> >last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
In message <20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl w
rites:
>I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
>last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
>on one node in my cluster for jeffr to use. He was too busy to
>investigate a
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/06/11 18:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> >>better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of sugge
Has anyone re-run those IO benchmarks?
Something smells fishy there.. (with the benchmarking.)
adrian
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann :
> On 07/06/11 12:37, arrowdodger wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
>>
>>> When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update"
>>> or
>>> when checking
Hi,
p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1 and p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1 conflict
both telling that the other one should be deleted.
So which one of the two to keep
so far, I opted for keeping p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1, deleting
p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1, is this wise or should it be the other
way round
On 07/06/11 18:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
If you are usin
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
> back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
>
If you are using MPI in numerical codes, th
On 07/06/11 12:37, arrowdodger wrote:
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
when compilin
Ideas anyone?
I am trying to rebuild SpamAssassin after a perl upgrade to 5.12.4 and
get this (I DID run perl-after-upgrade prior to this):
===> p5-Encode-Detect-1.01 depends on file:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4/Module/Build.pm - not found
===>Verifying install for
/usr/local/l
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Unga wrote:
> On Tue, 7/5/11, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > Does anybody successfully use the "ipfw fwd"? If so
> > > in which FreeBSD version?
>
> > Not I, but many do. On the face of it the rule looks
> > correct. Do you
> > have a TCP service running on localhost:1234 ?
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Ian Smith wrote:
> > Does anybody successfully use the "ipfw fwd"? If so
> in which FreeBSD version?
>
> Not I, but many do. On the face of it the rule looks
> correct. Do you
> have a TCP service running on localhost:1234 ? Does
> wlan0 exist? You
> may do better po
Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:37, Yuri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hit this problem periodically when a lot of disk space is gone and it's
> > hard to tell where did it go. Once it was thunderbird writing huge index
> > file as a consequence of some bug, on another occasion it was the
On Wed Jul 6 11, arrowdodger wrote:
> 2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
>
> > When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
> > when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
> > data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
> When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
> when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
> data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
> when compiling world, FreeBD 9.0 and FreeBSD
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann :
Could you post /etc/sysctl.conf and /boot/loader.conf? Also, the
output of uname -a on all machines would be nice.
And since you don't use GENERIC, could you also tell us what
difference your setup is from a GENERIC kernel?
--
chs,
When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update"
or when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying
large data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical
modelings) or when compiling world, FreeBD 9.0 and FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE
tend to "freeze"
On 23.06.2011, at 16:08, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Peter Toth [2011-06-23 22:54:59 +1200]:
>
>> Did you set the mount point properly for your ZFS root? My previous post
>> was intended as an example only, you need to tailor it to your setup.
>> Also, you can use mfsbsd for installation very easy
29 matches
Mail list logo