On 04/03/2012 04:36, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hmm, I would think that merely removing the offending file
> and copying the correct one from /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/
> would suffice.
I dunno, I don't think so. Why would it not be installed in the
downgrade process? Also, the filenames are
Hi,
I find it annoying having same items listed in multiple menus, e.g.
- Accessories - Bulk Rename
Orage Globaltime
Terminal
Thunar File Manager
Help
- Office - Orage Globaltime
- System - Bulk Rename
Terminal
On 3 March 2012 14:43, FreeBSD Mailing Lists wrote:
> On 03/03/12 12:31, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Stale header files in /usr/include maybe?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes that's it. It seems got changed to between 8.2 and
> 9.0. Fixed by csup of 9.0-R and doing the buildworld buildkernel etc.
>
Hmm, I
On Saturday 03 March 2012 20:55:30 Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
> One question again. Does your kernel support SATA?
>
> If not, it will not work. If it is a GENERIC kernel, it does.
>
> Erich
Yes, it is the GENERIC
Does /boot/boot1 should be different in ad0 and ad4?
Hi,
On Sunday 04 March 2012 08:47:39 Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2012 18:01:33 Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote:
> >
>
> In the disk I have 3 OS (FreeDOS, XP and FreeBSD)
>
I never used any other operating system on a machine with FreeBSD. So, my
comment
> "Robert" == Robert Simmons writes:
Robert> I'm replying off-list. No need to reply this back onto the
Robert> list.
Eh?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, C
On Saturday 03 March 2012 18:01:33 Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am replacing an IDE disk (ad0) with a SATA disk (ad4)
Sorry, I send it and I even notice
In the disk I have 3 OS (FreeDOS, XP and FreeBSD)
I use PartitionWizard to create the 3 slice in the new disk (ad4)
I us
Hi,
On Sunday 04 March 2012 08:01:33 Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote:
>
> I am replacing an IDE disk (ad0) with a SATA disk (ad4)
what did you want to tell us?
If you still have the old one, copy the data over.
Of course, you need a kernel which can use SATA.
fstab, maybe rc.conf shoul
Hi
I am replacing an IDE disk (ad0) with a SATA disk (ad4)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 03/04/12 08:50, Robert Simmons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500
Robert Simmons articulated:
Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior
of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list.
Than
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500
> Robert Simmons articulated:
>
>> Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior
>> of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list.
>
> Thanks Robert, there aren't many th
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500
Robert Simmons articulated:
> Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior
> of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list.
Thanks Robert, there aren't many things I appreciate more than advice
and criticism from so
So of course I can't install source using sysinstall either ...
No problem, I'll re-install (reverting a few hours of work) and do it
on the install.
Of course it works perfectly - I am able to install ports and src from
the CD that sysinstall fails on ...
As I'm getting used to though, there's m
Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior
of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list.
I apologize.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques
One more thing. An easy contribution that could be made is to replace
the old version of openssl with the new in the src tree of CURRENT.
Then build world and see what breaks. Try to fix what has broken.
Contribute patches up to the point that you don't understand the next
step or you have build
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +
> Matthew Seaman articulated:
>
>> Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to decide
>> such things.
>>
>> However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons:
>>
>> * openssl API chan
Some more statistics
http://piccy.info/view3/2703143/058d1f0dfaaa9e69f5d10255257c66b9/orig/
http://piccy.info/view3/2703161/e131f67a5288557cbbc8ac67c36a9be3/orig/
# netstat -Q
Configuration:
SettingCurrentLimit
Thread count 44
D
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:37:07AM +1030, David Walker wrote:
> So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports".
> I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinstall:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html
> Looks easy.
>
> For some u
On 03/03/2012 20:07, David Walker wrote:
> So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports".
> I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinstall:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html
> Looks easy.
>
> For some unknown reason sysinst
So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports".
I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinstall:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html
Looks easy.
For some unknown reason sysinstall spits the following:
Warning: The disc currently
On 03/03/12 12:31, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
Stale header files in /usr/include maybe?
Hi,
Yes that's it. It seems got changed to between 8.2
and 9.0. Fixed by csup of 9.0-R and doing the buildworld buildkernel etc.
thanks,
--
freebsd at growveg dot net
_
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:06:29 +0100
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> On 3 Mar 2012, at 16:37, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800
> > netroby wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks .
> >> I had resolved the problem :
> >>
> >> 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode.
> >> 2. umount
On 3 Mar 2012, at 16:37, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800
> netroby wrote:
>
>> Thanks .
>> I had resolved the problem :
>>
>> 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode.
>> 2. umount all device then run fsck -f
>> 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , retu
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800
netroby wrote:
> Thanks .
> I had resolved the problem :
>
> 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode.
> 2. umount all device then run fsck -f
> 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , return to normal mode.
> 4. delete the broken directory, and restore the
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:31:41 -0500
Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +
> Matthew Seaman articulated:
>
> > Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to
> > decide such things.
> >
> > However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons:
> >
> >* opens
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +
Matthew Seaman articulated:
> Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to decide
> such things.
>
> However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons:
>
>* openssl API changes between 0.9.x and 1.0.0 mean updating the
> sh
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE:
worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010
Matthew, why does FreeBSD continue to use an older version of OPENSSL
for the base system when a newer version is available? While I could
understand, even if not
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 04:03:52 -0800 (PST)
Bill Tillman articulated:
> I'm just a cheap, lazy hack and when faced with a similar problem
> with my Brother Laser printer I opted for the cheap, lazy way out. I
> plugged the printer into a USB port, installed Ghostsctipt (free),
> made a simple printer
On 03/03/2012 12:19, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:32 +
> Matthew Seaman articulated:
>
>> Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE:
>>
>> worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version
>> OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010
>
> Matthew, why does FreeBSD continue to use an older version of OPENSS
On 2 March 2012 14:44, FreeBSD Mailing Lists wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I had to downgrade from 9-R to 8-STABLE. To do this, I did the following:
>
> 1. rm -rf /usr/obj
> 2. pkg_delete -a
> 3. rm -rf /usr/ports
> 4. mkdir -p /usr/ports/distfiles
> 5. rm -rf /usr/src
> 6. rm -rf /usr/local/*
> 6. csu
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:32 +
Matthew Seaman articulated:
> Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE:
>
> worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version
> OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010
Matthew, why does FreeBSD continue to use an older version of OPENSSL
for the base system when a newer version is a
From: Da Rock
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Brother Printer
On 03/02/12 23:57, Michel Talon wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
>> Are you sure its just a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using?
>> Bash? I do
Michel Talon wrote:
> If you want to avoid such problems the only solution is to buy
> a printer with postscript or pdf support and direct network
> connection, that is an expensive one ...
I've been using a Samsung ML-2571N for something like a couple of
years now. It has a direct net connecti
Stephen Cook wrote:
On 3/2/2012 11:57 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 28/02/2012 03:24, Stephen Cook wrote:
I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on
cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g.
setting up clusters of replicated databases, web serve
34 matches
Mail list logo
