Hello there.
> I know ipfw can be loaded at boot time by adding statements to
> /boot/loader.conf.
>
> Problem is I dont know what the ipfw module names are.
>
> How do I find the ipfw names to use?
Not using ipfw by myself, but according to the handbook, the modules are
loaded automatically, w
2013-04-27 18:43, doug skrev:
If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
who can reach that port.
Only if it is listed in /etc/mail/access file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
2013-04-25 16:03, krad skrev:
type id from your user account and paste the results back here
uid=1001(bernt) gid=65534(nobody) groups=65534(nobody),0(wheel)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
I know ipfw can be loaded at boot time by adding statements to
/boot/loader.conf.
Problem is I dont know what the ipfw module names are.
How do I find the ipfw names to use?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 07:24 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:29:04 -0700
> Dennis Glatting wrote:
>
> >
> > I have two four socket Opteron 6200 motherboards with populated
> > 16-core Opteron 6200 series processors. Onw is Tyan (below) and the
> > other Supermicro.
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:32:53 +0200
"b...@todoo.biz" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to know if you would consider updating from 7.4 to 9.1
> directly ?
>
you might will face the same problem I face when trying to upgrade 7.x
to 8.x on old hardware. The USB controller was not supported anymore
26ed_rid=_edid__%26ed_mid=50085981
[[M9R4HKD-2UUI97-ZIN1XH-NSUCNJZL-FXKIBLOO-M-M2-20130427-ac9a82b7bf]]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:29:04 -0700
Dennis Glatting wrote:
>
> I have two four socket Opteron 6200 motherboards with populated
> 16-core Opteron 6200 series processors. Onw is Tyan (below) and the
> other Supermicro.
nice machines.
>
> When booted under 8.4 only two sockets are recognized
Hi Савельев Владимир,
El día Saturday, April 27, 2013 a las 08:59:36PM +0400, Савельев Владимир
escribió:
>Hi, colleagues!
>
>I am trying to install FreeBSD 9 to my notebook Acer Aspire V3-571G.
>Ports I am trying to install:
>
>/usr/ports/x11/xorg
>
>My issue is that bui
Hi, colleagues!
I am trying to install FreeBSD 9 to my notebook Acer Aspire V3-571G.
Ports I am trying to install:
/usr/ports/x11/xorg
My issue is that build fails on an unclear reason. Workflow is:
1. Install FreeBSD
2. Install system updates
3. Download and extract l
On 27/04/2013 17:43, doug wrote:
>>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E')
> If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
> who can reach that port.
You see where it says 'M=E' in that DAEMON_OPTIONS line? That should
probably be changed to
b...@todoo.biz writes:
> >> I wanted to know if you would consider updating from 7.4 to 9.1
> >> directly ?
> >>
> >> Has anyone tried that with success ?
>
> >While it is certainly possible, many (myself included) will
> > recommend a clean install. Doing so has the following advant
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I hav
Le 27 avr. 2013 à 18:11, Robert Huff a écrit :
>
> b...@todoo.biz writes:
>
>> I wanted to know if you would consider updating from 7.4 to 9.1
>> directly ?
>>
>> Has anyone tried that with success ?
>
> Someone, somewhere. :-)
>
>> I plan to use the freebsd-update method.
>
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, b...@todoo.biz wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to know if you would consider updating from 7.4 to 9.1 directly ?
Has anyone tried that with success ?
I plan to use the freebsd-update method.
Thanks for your feedback.
G.B.
If you are not a developer (I am not), I think the short a
Hi,
I wanted to know if you would consider updating from 7.4 to 9.1 directly ?
Has anyone tried that with success ?
I plan to use the freebsd-update method.
Thanks for your feedback.
G.B.
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
I have two four socket Opteron 6200 motherboards with populated 16-core
Opteron 6200 series processors. Onw is Tyan (below) and the other
Supermicro.
When booted under 8.4 only two sockets are recognized but four under
9.1. Is this expected behavior?
dmesg from 8.4:
mc# cat /var/run/dmesg.boot
>DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet')
>DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O')
>DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=1025, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')
>VIRTUSER_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/virtual-domains')
>FEATURE(`no_default_msa')
>DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E')
>
Matthew Seaman writes:
> >I use portupgrade for two features: portsclean (for which there
> > is probably a pkgng replacement, I just haven't bothered to check)
> > and pkg_sort (for which there is no alternative) which is necessary
> > for certain scripts.
>
> Well, given that pkgng i
On 27/04/2013 14:43, Robert Huff wrote:
> I use portupgrade for two features: portsclean (for which there
> is probably a pkgng replacement, I just haven't bothered to check)
> and pkg_sort (for which there is no alternative) which is necessary
> for certain scripts.
Well, given that pkgng i
Joe Altman writes:
> > Anyone else have this issue? Or am I the only one left still using
> > portupgrade and its associated tools?
>
> I use portupgrade and have noticed no failures.
I use portupgrade for two features: portsclean (for which there
is probably a pkgng replacement, I
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:54:59PM -0600, Tom Russo wrote:
>
> Anyone else have this issue? Or am I the only one left still using
> portupgrade and its associated tools?
I use portupgrade and have noticed no failures. I have never used
pkg_glob so I cannot address that. I have used portupgrade a
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
> All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
> sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
> which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able
> to figure out how to turn
23 matches
Mail list logo
