Re: sysvipc only for one jail

On 13. aug. 2013, at 06:14, Shane Ambler wrote: > If you missed the change, 9.3 is implementing shared memory using mmap. But still using sysvipc for some locks/mutexes, so doesn't allow you to run "sysvipc-free". Terje ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

On 12/08/2013 21:39, Trond Endrestøl wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:57+0200, David Demelier wrote: And thus, it's not enabled as postgresql tells: creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create shared memory segment: Function not implemented I'll lo

Re: 9.2-RC1: Problem with Kernel

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:01:14 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote: > Sorry again. Anyway, I have it nailed down now. For anyone who is > interested, the missing entry was: > > options ATA_CAM Correct. Line 84 and 264 have it commented out. This is the "new" method of talking to disk devices, simi

Re: 9.2-RC1: Problem with Kernel

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:47:36 +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 479, Issue 8, Message: 10 On Sun, 11 > Aug 2013 09:43:57 + (UTC) Walter Hurry > wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walt

Re: SolarFlare 10GB card

On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:47:27AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We've a brand spanking new SolarFlare 10GB nic for use with our beast of a >> server. >> >> However the vendor support page says the driver is in beta. > > If you lo

Re: SolarFlare 10GB card

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:47:27AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: > Hi all, > > We've a brand spanking new SolarFlare 10GB nic for use with our beast of a > server. > > However the vendor support page says the driver is in beta. If you look in the download[1], you'll see that the driver is named sfxge

SolarFlare 10GB card

Hi all, We've a brand spanking new SolarFlare 10GB nic for use with our beast of a server. However the vendor support page says the driver is in beta. Has any one used this card in production? Thanks in advance, - aurf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:09+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:57+0200, David Demelier wrote: > > > 2013/8/12 Trond Endrestøl : > > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:40+0200, David Demelier wrote: > > > > > >> 2013/8/11 Maciej Suszko : > > >> > Maciej Suszko wrote: > > >> > [...] > > >>

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

David Demelier wrote: > 2013/8/11 Maciej Suszko : > > Maciej Suszko wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> You can specify different params for each jail using _parameters, > >> for example: > >> > >> jail_jailname_params="allow.chflags=1 allow.sysvipc=1" > > > > Sorry, my mistake - it should be jail_jailnam

9.2-RC1 rc.firewall workstation type and myservices

Hello :-) I just have setup some service on 9.2-RC1. I want this service to be available on WAN but still I want to have stateful firewall running. I am using workstation firewall type and put the service port on firewall_myservices. However by default only TCP connections are accepted, still I ne

Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD

06.08.2013 22:58, Juris Kaminskis wrote: after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me. I always use foomatic for such things, it's quite easier to set up. For example I have: hplj2420d|lp|HP LaserJe

Re: if_bridge and ng_netflow

10.08.2013 16:51, Fbsd8 wrote: if_bridge is relatively new in FreeBSD. Netgraph precedes if_bridge and is un-aware of if_bridge. Change your if_bridge definition to a ng bridge definition and everything your trying to do should fall into place. ng_bridge lacks some if_bridge goodies like passin

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:57+0200, David Demelier wrote: > 2013/8/12 Trond Endrestøl : > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:40+0200, David Demelier wrote: > > > >> 2013/8/11 Maciej Suszko : > >> > Maciej Suszko wrote: > >> > [...] > >> >> > >> >> You can specify different params for each jail using _parameter

vBSDcon 2013 Registration Opens!

In April 2013, Verisign announced vBSDcon 2013 to be held October 25 – 27, 2013 in Dulles, VA. The conference, formatted to resemble an unConference concept, will feature speakers such as David Chisnall, Luigi Rizzo, Baptiste Daroussin, Henning Brauer, Reyk Floeter, and others. vBSDcon will in

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

2013/8/12 Trond Endrestøl : > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:40+0200, David Demelier wrote: > >> 2013/8/11 Maciej Suszko : >> > Maciej Suszko wrote: >> > [...] >> >> >> >> You can specify different params for each jail using _parameters, for >> >> example: >> >> >> >> jail_jailname_params="allow.chflags=1

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:40+0200, David Demelier wrote: > 2013/8/11 Maciej Suszko : > > Maciej Suszko wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> You can specify different params for each jail using _parameters, for > >> example: > >> > >> jail_jailname_params="allow.chflags=1 allow.sysvipc=1" > > > > Sorry, my mis

Re: sysvipc only for one jail

2013/8/11 Maciej Suszko : > Maciej Suszko wrote: > [...] >> >> You can specify different params for each jail using _parameters, for >> example: >> >> jail_jailname_params="allow.chflags=1 allow.sysvipc=1" > > Sorry, my mistake - it should be jail_jailname_parameters= of course. > -- > regards, Ma

which pam.d config does telnetd use for authentication when SRA is activated?

Hi all, how can I apply radius authentication for all possible types of freebsd "telnet" connections? I am trying to use pam_radius.so for my remote authentication. when I add "auth sufficient pam_radius.so" to pam.d/sshd file, it works fine and authentication is done via radius servers. If i r