Hi,
Is there a way of convincing print/auctex to depend on
editors/emacs-nox11 rather than editors/emacs24?
--
+---++
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrestøl, | Trond En
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Robert Simmons wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Polytropon wrote:
With GPT, there is no reason to use BSD disklabels at all.
And most modern computers do not have any problem booting it.
The old MBR approach (as well as dedicated) will probably only
be needed in n
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 20:00 -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
> Any contribution from a company like Verisign needs to be carefully
> scrutinized.
No it has to be turned down flat.
Huge companies from the USA at all events are untrustworthy. The only
trustworthy companies are such companies: "I have b
Hi,
Good points in Brett & Michael's posts, but for brevity not copied.
Best avoid having code written & reviewed just in USA as it would get less
trust globaly, NSA is a known alien mega spy, & USA even coerces non USA
citizens outside USA, eg
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/01/gary
Any contribution from a company like Verisign needs to be carefully
scrutinized. I also don't think it wise to allow them to take a
leadership role of any type.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Brett Glass wrote:
>
>> All:
>>
>> It's good to see corporate support of BSD, b
Brett Glass wrote:
> All:
>
> It's good to see corporate support of BSD, but at the same time I
> have mixed feelings about certain corporations -- Verisign among
> them -- hosting BSD-related conferences or becoming involved in the
> development of BSD-based operating systems. Why? Because Veris
All:
It's good to see corporate support of BSD, but at the same time I
have mixed feelings about certain corporations -- Verisign among
them -- hosting BSD-related conferences or becoming involved in the
development of BSD-based operating systems. Why? Because Verisign,
based in Reston, Virgi
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>> With GPT, there is no reason to use BSD disklabels at all.
>
> And most modern computers do not have any problem booting it.
> The old MBR approach (as well as dedicated) will probably only
> be needed in niche applications and exceptions. You
Hi all,
There are only 30 more days left to register for Verisign's vBSDcon. Online
registrations will become unavailable October 23, 2013. For those planning to
attend, we encourage you to register soon at http://www.vbsdcon.com/. You will
not want to miss this event. There will presentati
On 23/09/2013 11:54, Leslie Jensen wrote:
In the daily security run I see the following:
Checking setuid files and devices:
Checking negative group permissions:
3791965 -rwxr--r-x 1 admin wheel 172 Mar 9 10:59:55 2011
/usr/home/admin/bin/noip_update.sh
Is it just a reminder that the g
In the daily security run I see the following:
Checking setuid files and devices:
Checking negative group permissions:
3791965 -rwxr--r-x 1 admin wheel 172 Mar 9 10:59:55 2011
/usr/home/admin/bin/noip_update.sh
Is it just a reminder that the group has no x permissions or should I
give
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 08:25:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> It's "dangerous" because that partitioning format is rare outside of
> BSD-based systems. Disk utilities may not recognize it, and could
> damage it.
I think this is a good characterization of the term currently
used. In historical
12 matches
Mail list logo
