Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-04 Thread Robert Huff
Darrel writes: > Also, on my amd64 kernel I had to remove 'device atapicam'. > > The failed kernel build might be a bug, perhaps I should file a > report. As far as I know, this is completely unrelated to subversion/c(v)sup. Please check for other issues.

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Darrel wrote: Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or move ports to svn as well. I just did this (ports and docs) and - modulo an error on my part - it has been remarkably painless. (Make sure you eradicate all vesitges of c(v)sup acti

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or move ports to svn as well. I just did this (ports and docs) and - modulo an error on my part - it has been remarkably painless. (Make sure you eradicate all vesitges of c(v)sup activity. Hello Robert, Other than my

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Robert Huff
Darrel writes: > Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or > move ports to svn as well. I just did this (ports and docs) and - modulo an error on my part - it has been remarkably painless. (Make sure you eradicate all vesitges of c(v)sup activity.)

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" section of the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I likely couldn't produce anything intelligible for beginners (at least, not before 9.1 is out). If you do decide to write a new section, I could possibly offer help on

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Darrel writes: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman writes: >> >>> On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used with

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 src only, understood now. Thanks, Matthew. Yes. There is never any branching in the ports tree. The latest (i.e., head) version is, at any given time, expected to work for all (then) supported versions of the base system. This is not a change --

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 03/09/2012 19:00, Darrel wrote: Could I then run: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ or | and svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? Why don't you try it and see? All you'll get is an error mess

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Darrel writes: For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports >> >> >> On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >>> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1)

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 03/09/2012 19:00, Darrel wrote: > Could I then run: > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ > > or | and > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? > Why don't you try it and see? All you'll get is an error message essentially saying 'file not

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Matthew Seaman writes: On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used with subversion. stable/9 is the SVN equiv

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Robert Huff
Lowell Gilbert writes: > Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" > section of the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I > likely couldn't produce anything intelligible for beginners (at > least, not before 9.1 is out). That would be hugely appreciated

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Matthew Seaman writes: > On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >> with subversion. > > stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 Ah, yes, that ma

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Darrel wrote: >> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: >> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports 404. There are no branches in the ports, in exactly the same way that there wasn't a RELENG_9 tag you could use in a ports supfile. Head is the only option with po

Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Darrel writes: > Thanks, Matthew- and especially for mentioning to use -F on the first > subsequent run of mergemaster. > >> >> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src >> > > For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 port

[solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc

2012-09-03 Thread Darrel
Thanks, Matthew- and especially for mentioning to use -F on the first subsequent run of mergemaster. svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports or can the most recent port