Re: Good idea or Bad idea?

2005-11-10 Thread Mike Hernandez
On or near Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:02:06PM +0100, Mark Rowlands wrote something along the lines of: > There are definitely security benefits from stripping unwanted services from > your system and I rather like to know that my system (and ports) are up to > date with the latest patches which occ

Re: Good idea or Bad idea?

2005-11-10 Thread Mark Rowlands
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 23:09, Mike Hernandez wrote: ... > I have no trouble following docs, so I'm not really worried about blowing > everything up in the process (even though I might haha...) I'm just > wondering if there are any real (noticeable) performance increases if I > build my kerne

Re: Good idea or Bad idea?

2005-11-10 Thread Blake Darche
-fomit-frame-pointer IS EVIL. Do not use it. portupgrade won't build with it, cause ruby hates -fomit-frame-pointer. I would just do a fresh binary install. 6.0 is quite an amazing release... The speed is remarkable. My machine goes way faster than it did before. I am using the following CFL

Re: Good idea or Bad idea?

2005-11-09 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 16:09, Mike Hernandez wrote: > I'm just wondering if there are any real (noticeable) performance > increases if I build my kernel and base system from source. Of course > either way my ports will be compiled. I think there is, but I end my optimizations at setting th

Good idea or Bad idea?

2005-11-09 Thread Mike Hernandez
Hello all! I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 now, and of course I'm thinking about my upgrade to 6.0. What I'm wondering is if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm) to build everything from source. I have experience building linux from scratch (linuxfromscratch.org) and I have learned that sometimes it's just