Hello,
here is the output from top -S :
last pid: 1570; load averages: 0.56, 0.20, 0.10
up 0+02:59:36 14:03:53
76 processes: 4 running, 47 sleeping, 2 stopped, 23 waiting
CPU states: 14.9% user, 0.0% nice, 57.4% system, 27.7% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 17M Active, 6084K Inact, 14M Wired,
Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote:
I've tried PF, suggested by Martin Hudec and it seems that PF does not
have this performance problem. I like IPFW, I use it since year 1999,
but probably is time to switch to PF.
The impact you receive is caused by user-level 'natd'. Use 'ipnat(8)'
instead as it is
Hello,
I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd).
When I've upgraded the box from 4.8-20030810-STABLE to 6.0-RELEASE
I've noticed a performance degradation.
I've only one workstation behind the firewall and throughput
of downloading an ISO image through the firewall with
- Original Message -
From: Bohuslav Plucinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0
Hello,
I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall
Hello,
Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote:
I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd).
When I've upgraded the box from 4.8-20030810-STABLE to 6.0-RELEASE
I've noticed a performance degradation.
CPU states: 8.8% user, 0.0% nice, 59.6% system, 31.6% interrupt, 0.0% idle
PID
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:10:20PM +0100, Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote:
The top utility shows 100% CPU load:
What about top -S to show the kernel threads (since that's what's
using 90% of your CPU)?
last pid: 771; load averages: 0.25, 0.06, 0.02
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:33:33PM +0100, OxY wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bohuslav Plucinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8
