On 6/18/2010 2:45 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 6/18/2010 2:33 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I should mention that I don't think it is actually "dumping core".
> It's just repor
On 6/18/2010 2:33 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I should mention that I don't think it is actually "dumping core".
It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages...
>>> You'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> I should mention that I don't think it is actually "dumping core".
>>> It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages...
>> You'l
On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> I should mention that I don't think it is actually "dumping core".
>> It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages...
>
> You'll only get a core file if the current working directory of the
> proce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I should mention that I don't think it is actually "dumping core".
> It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages...
You'll only get a core file if the current working directory of the
process is w
On 6/18/2010 1:52 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 6/18/2010 1:34 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On 6/18/10 2:30 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Have you recently upgraded perl without running perl-after-upgrade
afterwards?
>>>
>>> I did upgrade perl some time ago. I do not recall if I ran
>>> perl
On 6/18/2010 1:34 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 6/18/10 2:30 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> Have you recently upgraded perl without running perl-after-upgrade
>>> afterwards?
>>>
>>
>> I did upgrade perl some time ago. I do not recall if I ran
>> perl-after-upgrade.
>> Wouldn't the 'portupgrade -f *'
On 6/18/10 2:30 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Have you recently upgraded perl without running perl-after-upgrade
afterwards?
I did upgrade perl some time ago. I do not recall if I ran perl-after-upgrade.
Wouldn't the 'portupgrade -f *' take care of this, or should I go run the
script now, "just in
On 6/18/2010 1:27 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/18/10 2:24 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> I have rebuilt world to today's 8.1-PRERELEASE sources
>>
>> I have forced a rebuild of every port on the system with:
>>
>> portupgrade -f *
>>
>> I have rebooted.
>>
>> I am still seeing these log
Hi,
On 6/18/10 2:24 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I have rebuilt world to today's 8.1-PRERELEASE sources
I have forced a rebuild of every port on the system with:
portupgrade -f *
I have rebooted.
I am still seeing these log messages:
(perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
The long r
I have rebuilt world to today's 8.1-PRERELEASE sources
I have forced a rebuild of every port on the system with:
portupgrade -f *
I have rebooted.
I am still seeing these log messages:
(perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
The long running perl processes on this system are associa
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:18:19 +0100, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 16/06/2010 15:11:15, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> I am running 8.1-PRERELEASE and seeing a half dozen of these a day:
>>
>>(perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
>>
>> Anyone have theories on this?
>
> You have a perl process or proce
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am running 8.1-PRERELEASE and seeing a half dozen of these a day:
>
> (perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
>
> Anyone have theories on this?
If perl doesn't always crash, but only when running certain
programs, it may be that a perl m
On 6/16/2010 9:18 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2010 15:11:15, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> I am running 8.1-PRERELEASE and seeing a half dozen of these a day:
>
>
>
>>(perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
>
>
>> Anyone have theories on this?
>
> You have a perl process or processes o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/06/2010 15:11:15, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am running 8.1-PRERELEASE and seeing a half dozen of these a day:
>
>
>
>(perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
>
>
> Anyone have theories on this?
You have a perl process or processes owned b
I am running 8.1-PRERELEASE and seeing a half dozen of these a day:
(perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11
Anyone have theories on this?
--
Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tund
16 matches
Mail list logo
