On 21 August 2013, at 18:14, Colin House wrote:
> On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
>> believe its also in 9.1. The command:
>>
>> dig freebsd.org +trace
>>
>> Only yields a dumb response. No useful informati
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:04 +1000
Colin House articulated:
> On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
> > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
> > 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
> >
> > dig freebsd.org +trace
> >
> > Only yields a dumb response. No use
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a co
> > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
> > 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
> >
> > dig freebsd.org +trace
> >
> > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is
> provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a
> complete tra
On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>
>> On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
>>> believe its also in 9.1. The command:
>>>
>>> dig freebsd.org
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a comp
Luke Cowell disturbed my sleep to write:
> *Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
> of named that I overlooked ?
Hm...it could be that named is only listening on IPv6 localhost (::1)
rather than IPv4 (127.0.0.1) by default, but that seems strange to me.
Try "grep lo
Ignore my previously stated question. What I meant to say was:
*Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
of named that I overlooked ?
On Feb 6, 2004, at 9:23, Luke Cowell wrote:
Hi I'm running FreeBSD 4.9 and I'm having a little difficulty with
named/dig.
%uname -a
ROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JoeB
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:43 PM
> To: Fuzzy
> Cc: FBSDQ
> Subject: RE: dig command for reverse dsn check
>
>
>>>>>>>>>> snip <<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Thanks
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 09:42 PM, JoeB wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, JoeB wrote:
How do I check my ISP domain name to see if it's DNS server is
configured correctly for email reverse DNS lookup?
I'd use:
dig -x ip.ad.dr.ess PTR [@name.server]
the ANSWER SECTION shows what DNS thinks i
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, JoeB wrote:
> How do I check my ISP domain name to see if it's DNS server is
> configured correctly for email reverse DNS lookup? I have used dig
> isp-domain-name but I can not tell from what it displays what to
look
> for to verify it's configured correctly. The dig display i
: c.root-servers.net
192.33.4.12
;; WHEN: Sun Oct 27 20:41:04 2002
;; MSG SIZE sent: 17 rcvd: 436
$
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 18:09, D. Penev wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +0000, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> >Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?
&
Hi,
I've made the changes to rule 00618 as you've suggested, but now I get
a different error:
# dig .ns @a.root-servers.net
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> .ns @a.root-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res_nmkquery: buffer too small
# dig .ns @b.root-servers.net
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> .ns @b.root-servers.ne
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?
[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of "DENY UDP" mess]ages in
/var/log/security
From: Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ruben
Okay,
I've been hacking about with my ipfw rules in order to nail this
down, but I'm still coming up against a wall here..,
I've made this change:
# Allow out access to Internet Domain name server
$fwcmd add 00617 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup
keep-state
#$fwcmd add 00618 a
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify:
>
> pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26
>
> Verbose:
> Public K
Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify:
pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26
Verbose:
Public Key Server -- Verbose Index ``0xDC92FBD7 ''
Type bits/keyIDDate Use
Hi Ruben,
Thanks much for the reply - comments inline...,
> > Verifying relevant ipfw rules:
> > # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server
> > $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup
> > keep-state
> > $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif s
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:24:07PM +, Stacey Roberts typed:
> Hello,
> I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7
> reset itself - lots of "DENY UDP" messages in /var/log/security], but
> I've been trying to trouble shoot the "DENY" messages in
> /var/log/security usin
19 matches
Mail list logo
