On Thursday 28 January 2010 7:26:24 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-01-28 13:06, Robert Noland wrote:
> > John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue.
> > The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and
> > tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The bo
On 2010-01-28 13:06, Robert Noland wrote:
John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue.
The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and
tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The bootstrap code knows how to read the
GPT tables and can deal with> 2 tb lb
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:23 -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use
> >> EFI
> >> to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>> GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI
>> to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based
>> bootstrap that can handle GPT-label
On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote:
GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI
to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based
bootstrap that can handle GPT-labelled disks. I doubt the SuperMicro tech is
familiar with that case. I th
On Wednesday 27 January 2010 11:45:36 am Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hey
>
> I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
> partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
> I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
> D945GCLF2) having su
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hey
>
> I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
> partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
> I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
> D945GCLF2) having supposedl
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hey
>
> I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
> partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
> I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
> D945GCLF2) having s
on 27/01/2010 18:45 Dan Naumov said the following:
> Hey
>
> I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
> partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
> I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
> D945GCLF2) having supposedly
GPT booting is I believe only natively supported using an EFI BIOS.
However if you wish to use GPT booting with FreeBSD its not too hard,
you just cant install using sysinstall.
The Examples section of the gpart manpage is what i used to configure
the disk for my home server, a zotac ion atom based
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
> partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
> I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
> D945GCLF2) having supposedly
Hey
I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT
partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that
I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel
D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now
I am having an email
12 matches
Mail list logo