On 1/30/2010 1:35 AM, Adam Vande More wrote:
There is an rc flags to automatically do a full fsck instead of
backgroud, but I am unsure exactly what you mean by user intervention.
Practice has shown that while softupdates handle most situations
cleanly, they don't handle ALL situations. In
On 1/28/2010 6:51 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Nikos Vassiliadisnvass9...@gmx.comwrote:
Hi,
I am using a 40MB journal on a 500MB compact flash.
Would that be sane, or I am causing more harm than
good?
My concerns are:
1) wear leveling. The journal is on
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis nvass9...@gmx.comwrote:
fsck time in my case is not an issue. What concerns me mostly is
a situation where user intervention is required. The CF filesystem
will be used in a embedded system and should work without user
intervention. I too
Hi,
I am using a 40MB journal on a 500MB compact flash.
Would that be sane, or I am causing more harm than
good?
My concerns are:
1) wear leveling. The journal is on specific part
of the disk writing again and again. That
should be handled by the CF itself. Though
I am
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis nvass9...@gmx.comwrote:
Hi,
I am using a 40MB journal on a 500MB compact flash.
Would that be sane, or I am causing more harm than
good?
My concerns are:
1) wear leveling. The journal is on specific part
of the disk writing again
