On Thursday 17 September 2009 19:55:33 Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed:
> > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote:
> > > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Co
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote:
> > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
> > >> Tom Worster wrote:
> > >>> thanks, Mel, that's good t
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote:
> On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
> >> Tom Worster wrote:
> >>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
> >>>
> >>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will tur
Tom Worster wrote:
> On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, "Matthew Seaman"
> wrote:
>
>> Tom Worster wrote:
>>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
>>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>> If you're starting service foo, then you should be able t
On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, "Matthew Seaman"
wrote:
> Tom Worster wrote:
>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>
> If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define command
> argumen
Tom Worster wrote:
is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define command
arguments by setting foo_flags="-a -b -c". This is a convention
On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
>> Tom Worster wrote:
>>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
>>>
>>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy
>>> solution for me.
>>
>> You could also just put:
>>
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
> Tom Worster wrote:
> > thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
> >
> > i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy
> > solution for me.
>
> You could also just put:
>
> sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no"
>
> into y
Tom Worster wrote:
> thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
>
> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy
> solution for me.
You could also just put:
sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no"
into your /etc/rc.conf file.
Pretty much all of the rc.d scripts support the use of NA
On 9/16/09 1:35 PM, "Mel Flynn"
wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote:
>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>>
>> for example, how does one start sshd using /et
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote:
> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>
> for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it
> '-o X11Forwarding=no'
is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it
'-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a config file?
tom
_
12 matches
Mail list logo