Matthew Seaman wrote:
I'll add your patches and post an updated shar later on.
Done.
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Matt Emmerton wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile="YES"}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires devel/re2c,
which
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
There's a .shar of the new port at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile="YES"}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires devel/re2c,
which is an optional depende
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
> I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile="YES"}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires devel/re2c,
which is an optional depen
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> There's a .shar of the new port at:
>
> http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
>
> Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
> send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks great to me. I
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
one
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
one script required, which
On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:45 AM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> However, neither of these have been accepted by the
>> p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
>
> It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
> channels you use and whet
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> However, neither of these have been accepted by the
> p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
channels you use and whether you want sa-compile (which isn't
supported by eit
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin
from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said
"yes"), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find
nor in /etc/periodic or /usr/local/etc/periodic.
You need some s
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:05:59 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing
> SpamAssassin from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do
> this (I said "yes"), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab
> I can find nor in /etc/periodic or
On Jan 1, 2010, at 5:19 PM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600
> Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
>
>
>> it is likely that
>> some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who
>> use sa-update.
>
> It's already available in sa-update.
Great.
How do I know if I am runnin
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> There is discussion on the SA mailing list, and it is likely that
> some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who
> use sa-update.
It's already available in sa-update.
___
I've submitted a PR for this, but email administrators who use SpamAssassin may
wish to take immediate action.
There is a SpamAssassin rule which treats messages with dates after 2009 as
"far in the future". This adds about 3 points to the SA score, so is very
substantial.
I've posted details
15 matches
Mail list logo
