Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-12 Thread Thomas Mueller
Regarding my question, How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if not using portsnap? Helmut Schneider had two suggestions: > You install ports from CD/DVD. Or use pkg_add -r subversion. :) > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/ I guess I could use the latter and then buil

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-11 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:15:24 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > One question comes up that I didn't think of immediately. > > How do you use svn on a fresh install of FreeBSD, no ports yet? > > svn/subversion is not part of the base system. > > How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if no

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-11 Thread Helmut Schneider
Thomas Mueller wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to > > fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then > > for ports or also fetch them via svn? > > Polytropon re

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-11 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if not using portsnap? You use pkg_add (or the youngest newcomer pkg) -- chs, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.free

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch > sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or > also fetch them via svn? Polytropon responded: > Ports and system sources ar

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-09 Thread Helmut Schneider
C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider > wrote: > > Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep > > using svn for both. > > While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so > frequently? Remember, it's not just fetching the source

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-09 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep using > svn for both. While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so frequently? Remember, it's not just fetching the sources and ports, you must also compile

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-09 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 11:26:50 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to > > > fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still u

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-09 Thread Helmut Schneider
Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to > > fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then > > for ports or also fetch them via svn? > > Ports and syste

Re: svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-09 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch > sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or > also fetch them via svn? Ports and system sources are managed independently

svn and/or portsnap

2012-09-09 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or also fetch them via svn? Thanks, Helmut ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freeb