Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Robert Huff
Hello: > >2) make rmconfig > > Thanks. Never heard of that option before. Note also "make showconfig". Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote: > I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security > issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it > is not. > What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the > package/port stay restricted until the develo

win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Yousef Adnan Raffah
I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it is not. What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the package/port stay restricted until the developer/port owner fix the security issue

Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote: > > I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security > > issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it > > is not. > > What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the > > package/port stay restricted u

Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: >> Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote: >>> I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security >>> issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it >>> is not. >>> What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the >>> packag