TB --- 2011-01-13 05:46:48 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:46:48 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:46:48 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:47:02 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:47:02 - /
CC'ing responsible committers...
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/if_llatbl.c
- Forwarded message from FreeBSD Tinderbox -
> From: FreeBSD Tinderbox
> To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , sta...@freebsd.org,
> i...@freebsd.org
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:46:48 GMT
> Cc:
> Subje
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:32:43 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:32:43 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:32:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:33:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:33:05 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:13 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:13 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:46 - /usr/bi
On Wed, January 12, 2011 2:32 pm, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:00:09PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:52AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>>
>>> hi all!
>>>
>>> The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
>>> can i subsitue
I think we'd be happy with whatever solution someone was kind enough to donate
the time towards.
Although, stripping the Solaris FMD stuff down to just the ZFS parts would help
keep Solaris/FreeBSD a bit closer in their ZFS implementations, which is of
arguable importance, but I do like standa
On 01/12/11 19:32, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech sup
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:00:09PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:52AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> > hi all!
>> >
>> > The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
>> > can i subsitue,
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech support..
..back to the point:
Solaris runs
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:00:09PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:52AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > hi all!
> >
> > The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
> > can i subsitue, gsed not affected with this bug:
>
> > FreeBSD xxx 8.1-RE
On 2011-Jan-12 02:32:52 +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
>can i subsitue, gsed not affected with this bug:
gsed contains non-standard extensions and you have been suckered into
using them. Try using 'gsed --posix' and/or setting PO
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>> 2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov :
Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> 2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov :
>>> Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
>>> to not use device names for FSes in "/etc/fstab" at all. But what to
>>> do with sw
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> 2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov :
>> Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
>> to not use device names for FSes in "/etc/fstab" at all. But what to
>> do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
>> "/dev/ad
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov :
> Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
> to not use device names for FSes in "/etc/fstab" at all. But what to
> do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
> "/dev/ada0s1b" or "/dev/ad0s1b" whatever name it has now?
Use glabe
On 12.01.2011 21:02, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Stable.
>
> Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
> to not use device names for FSes in "/etc/fstab" at all. But what to
> do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
> "/dev/ada0s1b" or "/dev/ad0s1b"
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Stable.
>
> Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
> to not use device names for FSes in "/etc/fstab" at all. But what to
> do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
> "/dev/ada0
Hello, Stable.
Now, with "newfs -L name", geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for FSes in "/etc/fstab" at all. But what to
do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
"/dev/ada0s1b" or "/dev/ad0s1b" whatever name it has now?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Se
On 2011-Jan-09 10:32:48 -0500, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
>Daniel Braniss writes...
>> I have it pxebooting nicely and running with an NFS root
>> but it then reports locking problems: devd, syslogd, moused (and maybe
Actually, that was me, not Daniel.
>Are you mounting /var via nfs?
Yes. I'm usin
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:30:39PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >why and we can't ask him now, I'm afraid. I just sent an e-mail to
>
> What happened to him?
Oops, I was thinking of something else.
http://valleywag.gawker.com/383763/freebsd-developer-kip-macy-arrested-for-tormenting-tenants
Marcu
20 matches
Mail list logo