On 11/18/2016 13:30, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 14/11/2016 14:00, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/14/2016 12:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Okay. Luckily for us, it seems that 'm' is available in frame 5. It also
happens to be the first field of 'struct faultstate'. So, could you pl
On 11/14/2016 12:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 14/11/2016 11:35, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/14/2016 10:07, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Hmm, I've just noticed another interesting thread:
Thread 668 (Thread 101245):
#0 sched_switch (td=0xf800b642aa00, newtd=0xf8000285f000, flags=) at
On 11/14/2016 10:07, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 13/11/2016 15:28, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/13/2016 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 12/11/2016 14:40, Henri Hennebert wrote:
[snip]
Could you please show 'info local' in frame 14?
I expected that 'nd' variable would be defi
On 11/13/2016 14:28, Henri Hennebert wrote:
This 2 threads are innd processes. In core.txt.4:
8 14789 29165 0 24 4 40040 6612 zfs DN- 0:00.00 [innd]
8 29165 1 0 20 0 42496 6888 select Ds- 0:01.33 [innd]
8 49778 29165 0 24 4 40040 6900 zfs
On 11/13/2016 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 12/11/2016 14:40, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I attatch it
Thank you!
So, these two threads are trying to get the lock in the exclusive mode:
Thread 687 (Thread 101243):
#0 sched_switch (td=0xf800b642b500, newtd=0xf8000285ea00, flags=) at /usr
On 11/11/2016 12:24, Andriy Gapon wrote:
At this stage I would try to get a system crash dump for post-mortem analysis.
There are a few way to do that. You can enter ddb and then run 'dump' and
'reset' commands. Or you can just do `sysctl debug.kdb.panic=1`.
In either case, please double-che
On 11/10/2016 19:40, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 19:55, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 18:33, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 18:12, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 16:54, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 17:20, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon
On 11/10/2016 18:33, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 18:12, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 16:54, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 17:20, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Interesting. I can not spot any suspicious thread that would hold the vnode
On 11/10/2016 16:54, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 17:20, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Interesting. I can not spot any suspicious thread that would hold the vnode
lock. Could you please run kgdb (just like that, no arguments), then execute
'bt
On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 10/11/2016 12:30, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 11/10/2016 11:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 09/11/2016 15:58, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 11/09/2016 07:48, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I encounter a strange deadlock on
FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3
On 11/10/2016 11:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 09/11/2016 15:58, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 11/09/2016 07:48, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I encounter a strange deadlock on
FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 #0 r308260:
Fri Nov 4 02:51:33 CET 2016
r
On 11/09/2016 19:23, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le mer. 9 nov. 16 à 15:03:49 +0100, Henri Hennebert
écrivait :
[root@avoriaz ~]# procstat -kk 85656
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
85656 101112 find -mi_switch+0xd2
sleepq_wait+0x3a sleeplk+0x1b4
On 11/09/2016 14:58, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 11/09/2016 07:48, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I encounter a strange deadlock on
FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 #0 r308260:
Fri Nov 4 02:51:33 CET 2016
r...@avoriaz.restart.bel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AVORIAZ amd64
I encounter a strange deadlock on
FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 #0
r308260: Fri Nov 4 02:51:33 CET 2016
r...@avoriaz.restart.bel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AVORIAZ amd64
This system is exclusively running on zfs.
After 3 or 4 days, `periodic daily` is locked
On 02/18/2016 01:24, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test
> whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with
> just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid
> of that problem - especially on amd64 - and rep
On 02/03/2016 02:03, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:07:38 +1100
>> Peter Jeremy said:
>
> peter> As others have said, you need to provide lots more detail on your
> peter> configuration.
>
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+
> Memory: 4GB
> HDD: 3TB
>
> I'm
Hello,
Dig can't be linked if WITH_BIND_XML=yes is added to /etc/src.conf.
[root@morzine src]# svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn.restart.bel/svn-FreeBSD-base/stable/9
Relative URL: ^/stable/9
Repository Root: http://svn.restart.bel/svn-FreeBSD-base
Repository UUID:
On 09/02/2013 01:54, Thomas Laus wrote:
> Hi,
>
:-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for
> device.
I encounter the same problem and reinstalling dvd+rw-tools-7.1 solved it.
Henri
>>
>> Could someone else try to make a 'dump to DVD' backup [...]
>> /sbin/dump -0u
On 07/29/2013 11:18, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My entry for newsyslog in /etc/crontab is:
>
> 0 * * * * rootnewsyslog -t \%Y-\%m-\%d_\%H:\%M
>
> And I get:
>
> newsyslog: Could not convert time string to time value: No such file or
> directory
&
Hello,
When compiling world of 9.2-BETA2 and adding in /etc/src.conf
WITH_BIND_XML=yes
and with libxml2-2.8.0_2 (textproc/libxml2) installed in /usr/local
I get this link error:
===> usr.bin/dig (all)
/usr/local/lib/libxml2.a(xzlib.o): In function `__libxml2_xzclose':
xzlib.c:(.text+0x69): und
Hello,
My entry for newsyslog in /etc/crontab is:
0 * * * * rootnewsyslog -t \%Y-\%m-\%d_\%H:\%M
And I get:
newsyslog: Could not convert time string to time value: No such file or
directory
I try to use the newsyslog from head to to avail. This solution was
working a month ago (see Re
On 02/12/2013 12:22, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 01/19/2013 06:58, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> On 01/18/13 12:50, Brandon Gooch
On 06/25/2012 10:50, Mitya wrote:
My kernel options:
# Bus support.
device acpi
device pci
# Modular ATA
device atadisk # ATA disk drives
device atacore # Core ATA functionality
device atapci # PCI bus support; only generic c
On 06/05/2012 10:17, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/04/2012 10:53, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup
bombs out with Bus error: 10.
Example:
# /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 /usr
On 06/04/2012 10:53, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup
bombs out with Bus error: 10.
Example:
# /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/src/stable-supfile
Parsing supfile "/usr/src/stable-supfile"
Connecting to localhost
Connected to loc
On 04/20/2012 18:38, Ingrid Ditra wrote:
Hi, folks!
I am in the middle of really creepy problem with my new FreeBSD box. I would
appreciate any ideas about what the hell happened.
I've installed FreeBSD 9.0 from CD on IBM System x3550 server (with RAID-5 on 4
hard drives) and moved on it the m
On 01/14/2012 11:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:29:00AM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
>> On 01/14/2012 09:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 13/01/2012 22:57, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>> But if the appropriate misc/compatX port is installed
On 01/14/2012 09:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 13/01/2012 22:57, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> But if the appropriate misc/compatX port is installed, then
>> those libraries do actually exist and the system should be fully
>> usable... Modulo the compat libraries not working with the new
>> kernel as K
On 01/14/2012 09:47, Andre Goree wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:58:13 -0600, Andre Goree wrote:
>
>> I recently csup'd 9-STABLE and was able to get it working along with my
>> custom kernel. I'm now in the process of rebuilding all my ports, and
>> I've
>> come across something when running 'po
Hello,
On 2 systems running 9.0-RC2 amd64 tripwire segfault.
The problem occurs during `tripwire --check` after +/- 20 minutes of
execution:
Here is the bt
[root@tignes tripwire]# gdb ./tripwire
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, cover
On 06/22/2011 17:58, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223365)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
*/
/* Memory Locations */
- .set MEM_REL,0x700 # Relocat
On 06/22/2011 16:23, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector.
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the stack so it doesn't get trashed by
ca
On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the
On 06/21/2011 23:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:13:20 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
and I get:
Read error: 04
Hmm, that is the error for an invalid sector. Try this patch. It reshuffles
a few more things and adds code to dump the
On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:02:28 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri
On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@ -234,9 +234,12 @@ nread.1: xor %ecx,%ecx # Get
callw read
On 06/20/2011 15:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:04:07 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/17/2011 19:37, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
>> mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
>
> Can you try reverting this change:
>
> Author: jhb
> Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
Can you try reverting this change:
Author: jhb
Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011
New Re
On 06/16/2011 07:32, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
I just redo everything, and changed the order of freebsd-zfs and
freebsd-swap. The "Read error" still happens!
Just a me too.
Everything was working great with zfsboot from 8.2-RELEASE + a patch
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/153552).
Hello and merry Xmas to everybody,
I upgrade a remote server from 8.1-RELEASE to 8.2-RC1.
This server have one disk:
[r...@tignes ~]# gpart show
=> 63 488397105 ada0 MBR (233G)
63 12583809 1 freebsd (6.0G)
12583872 475813296 2 freebsd [active] (227G)
=>
tcode using gpart on each of your root pool ZFS disks.
I prefer to install bootcode BEFORE. Then reboot and check it with the
printf of my simple patch. Then you can zpool/zfs upgrade without problem.
>
> Am I understanding this correctly ?
>
> Thanks for all the work on ZFS BTW, i
On 09/16/2010 17:18, jhell wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
caveats to upgrading ?
Do I just do
zpool upgrade -a
zfs upgrade -a
or are there any extra steps ?
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bootcode better tha
On 08/13/2010 20:02, Andreas Mayer wrote:
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD wurd.dev001.net 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19
> 02:36:49 UTC 2010
> r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> 2010/8/13 Malcolm Waltz :
>> Have you tried "zfs list -t all" ?
>
> I have, it p
On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM
generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback.
What patch does:
- It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or
later, CAM will automatically
On 01/09/2010 05:39, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Frank wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote:
Option "AllowEmptyInput" "off"
EndSection
Comment out the line containing AllowEmptyInput.
OK, this took care of the nothing-works-unless-mouse-is-moved problem
but why d
Le 1/01/2010 16:40, Ian Smith a écrit :
Hi,
Thought I had a clue on using cvsweb, but seem to have mislaid it ..
After updating 7.0-RELEASE to RELENG_7 sources on Dec 28, checking
UPDATING before and during buildworld, went hunting on cvsweb for the
very version of UPDATING I was reading, 1.507
packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.531/0.721/0.884/0.145 ms
Thanks
Henri
-Original Message-
From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be]
Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM
To: Li, Qing
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 8.0-
0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.531/0.721/0.884/0.145 ms
Thanks
Henri
-Original Message-
From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be]
Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM
To: Li, Qing
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 8.0-BETA1 - fo
link#3
no entry for 2001:41d0:2:2d29:1:1::
This is by design as part of the new architecture in 8.0, which maintains
the L2 ARP/ND6 and L3 routing tables separately.
-- Qing
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Henri Hennebert
Sent: Fri 7/10/
Hello,
After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when
connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global
unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated!
My configuration:
[r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 150
Hello,
After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when
connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global
unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated!
My configuration:
[r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi.
I put zfs on my external usb-disk, so I can backup my harddisk with zfs
send/receive.
I now have corruption on this volume.
[r...@sjakie ~]# zpool status -v
pool: extern
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corr
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
One of my FreeBSD boxes is a 7-STABLE/amd64 one on ZFS, now in
production for over a 1.5 years now and which receives regular upgrades.
The last installation of FreeBSD 7-STABLE was just about 2 weeks ago.
Today the upgrade failed the first time:
--
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and
there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed
to happen ?
Sadly a known and ignored problem of
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
just work ?
Kip Macy created a bra
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I encounter this problem for the second time. The system is working
perfectly well but suddenly the command `zfs list' don't work and can't
be killed.
Here is a procstat of the culprit:
[r...@morzine ~]# procstat -k 91766
PIDTID COMM
Hello,
I encounter this problem for the second time. The system is working
perfectly well but suddenly the command `zfs list' don't work and can't
be killed.
Here is a procstat of the culprit:
[r...@morzine ~]# procstat -k 91766
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
91766 1
Kip Macy wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
I'm thinking that too. I spent some time taking stabs at figuring it out
yesterday but didn't get anywhere useful. I did try compiling the -current
src/sys/boot tree on 7.2 after a couple header tweaks to make it compile b
Doug Rabson wrote:
On 1 Jun 2009, at 11:22, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
During my tests (succesful) to directly boot from ZFS (with zfsboot
and gptzfsboot) I encounter the error "can't boot 'kernel'" if too
many devices/pools are connected to the machine. In my c
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/05/2009 15:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
So anyone else feels that this is a bug?
on 28/05/2009 16:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel
is not found. the console shows:
forth not found
definitions not found
only not found
Hello,
During my tests (succesful) to directly boot from ZFS (with zfsboot and
gptzfsboot) I encounter the error "can't boot 'kernel'" if too many
devices/pools are connected to the machine. In my case:
2 SAS disks with 2 pools
2 SATA disks with 2 pools
1 USB key with one pool
`heap` command
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel
is not found. the console shows:
forth not found
definitions not found
only not found
(the above repeated severa
2:11 AM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new fea
Ruben Lara wrote:
Hi all!
I just installed postfix, after build world without sendmail
If i try to send mail i get:
mail# mail aaa
Subject: a
a
.
EOT
mail# mail: /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory
Event with WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes in /etc/src.conf, make installworld must
create thi
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a po
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1 0x0008012a0feb in open () from /lib/libc.so.7
#2 0x00080129ea59 in open () from /lib/libc.so.7
#3 0x0008012a1f2e in vfprintf () from
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Artem Belevich wrote:
I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not
apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent
changes on -stable.
--Artem
Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd rather find out
Artem Belevich wrote:
Did you by any chance do that from single-user mode? ZFS seems to rely
on hostid being set.
Try running "/etc/rc.d/hostid start" and then re-try your zfs commands.
I was in multiuser with hostid set.
Henri
--Artem
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Henri
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not
apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent
changes on -stable.
The patch is ok for stable.
now I get for the pool with my root:
[r...@morzine libzpool
e or directory
But rpool have been used for many boot now - strange ...
Thanks for your patch and time
Henri
--Artem
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support so
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new fea
ck or crash.
Henri
-Kip
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
contin
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new fea
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a po
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new fea
Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
Not really a problem but a question: Is the v13 on-disk format
exactly the same as that used by Solaris/Opensolaris?
It is supposed to be. The sources are the same. However, I have not
tested interoperability.
Does this
Marten Vijn wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 16:49 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on
7.2-RC1. (console="comconsole,vidconsole" in /boot/loader.conf and
-Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config).
/var/log/message show: &
Sorry for the previous wrong followup :-(
Hello,
Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on
7.2-RC1. (console="comconsole,vidconsole" in /boot/loader.conf and
-Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config).
/var/log/message show: 'sio0: type 16550A, console' and from the vga
po
Hello,
Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on
7.2-RC1. (console="comconsole,vidconsole" in /boot/loader.conf and
-Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config).
/var/log/message show: 'sio0: type 16550A, console' and from the vga
point of view, console output from kernel is
xer wrote:
Hello
Mine 6.4-STABLE today has a strange problem regarding "phpsysinfo" that i use
it.
Ports are updated,but phpsysinfo (on browser) today show errors about pcre:
---
Notice: Undefined offset: 3 in
/usr/local/www/data-dist/phpsysinfo/includes/os/class.FreeBS
Just for the record,
I add options GEOM_PART_BSD and GEOM_PART_MBR to my kernel config (I
want to see what gpart was saying abount my disks).
At boot time I get some messages as:
GEOM: ad4s2: geometry does not match label.
GEOM: ad4s2: media size does not match label.
and more important: hal
John Birrell wrote:
For those people experiencing a performance degradation since the DTrace import,
please update your copy of
src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_kmem.c
by either cvsup of direct edit to remove "#define KMEM_DEBUG".
You only need to rebuild the opensolaris kernel
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the
endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with
zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian
changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created
with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch
John Birrell wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:40:12AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I believe that the buildworld that you have is OK, even when built with the
CTF data it's the installworld when things go bad.
Do you need me to send you any files to recover from this problem?
No pr
John Birrell wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I try, but with the wold of 7.1-PRERELEASE I got
cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault: 11 (program ld)
Please submit a full bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
*** Error cod
John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008 03:57:46 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
Henri Hennebert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the
endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with
zpools created with non-dtrace
Henri Hennebert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the
endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with
zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace
kernels and vice versa.
http://www.FreeBSD.org
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian
changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created
with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
I am using a recent 7.0-Stable (x86) and a Zfs pool for my data.
After the dtrace import, I have updated my sources (and make buildworld, make
buildkernel) and I no longer have access to my Zfs pool (just to be sure, I
have since updated twice more to work aroun
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hey,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING?rev=1.507;only_with_tag=RELENG_7
NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 7.x IS SLOW:
FreeBSD 7.x has many debugging features turned on, in
both the kernel and userland. These features atte
Julian Stacey wrote:
Henri Hennebert wrote 2 emails with same common text
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:20:38 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The first private shouting got answered. Then came
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
As some of you may already know, I'm working on a graphical installer
for FreeBSD 7, which was started as a Google SoC 2007 project but still
continues.
10+ years back when Jordan did first pre= X, 24x80 graphical installer,
soon afer he'd finished a
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:47:02PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I encounter a deadlock while
1) cpio -p from a ZFS filesystem to a UFS filesystem
2) rsync from ZFS to ZFS
I was running with this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zgd_done.patch
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo