Hello Jeremy
On 13.10.08 16:24, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Two items which are missed (sort of implied though): motherboard BIOS
version, and SCSI card BIOS version.
Ok, for my system this would be:
BIOS Information
Vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
Version: V1.06
Release
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:10:31PM +0200, Fabian Wenk wrote:
> Hello João
>
> On 13.10.08 13:43, JoaoBR wrote:
>> On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:57:11 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:18 +0200
>>>
>>> Fabian Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> > I do have a system with FreeBSD/am
Hello João
On 13.10.08 13:43, JoaoBR wrote:
On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:57:11 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:18 +0200
Fabian Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do have a system with FreeBSD/amd64 6.3-RELEASE with 4 GB RAM
> and an Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter (ahc)
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 07:39:44AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
>> On Sunday 12 October 2008 14:10:36 Scott Long wrote:
>>
> I am using some LSI (mpt driver) ultra4 (U320 scsi) and LSI SAS
> controllers in FreeBSD 7.x amd64 with 20G of ram, and Adaptec (aac
> driver) with a
JoaoBR wrote:
On Sunday 12 October 2008 14:10:36 Scott Long wrote:
I am using some LSI (mpt driver) ultra4 (U320 scsi) and LSI SAS
controllers in FreeBSD 7.x amd64 with 20G of ram, and Adaptec (aac
driver) with a 5th generation RAID card with 8G of ram, both have no
such corruption problems. P
On Monday 13 October 2008 10:50:54 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:35:10 -0200
>
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > It's a driver problem. If you want to use SCSI then you'll have to
> > > limit memory to 3.5 GB.
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:37 -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
> On Saturday 11 October 2008 13:26:29 Adam McDougall wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:35:10 -0200
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > It's a driver problem. If you want to use SCSI then you'll have to limit
> > memory to 3.5 GB.
>
I probably should have written - it seems to be a problem with
On Sunday 12 October 2008 14:10:36 Scott Long wrote:
> >> I am using some LSI (mpt driver) ultra4 (U320 scsi) and LSI SAS
> >> controllers in FreeBSD 7.x amd64 with 20G of ram, and Adaptec (aac
> >> driver) with a 5th generation RAID card with 8G of ram, both have no
> >> such corruption problems.
On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:57:11 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:18 +0200
>
> Fabian Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Jeremy
> >
> > On 11.10.08 18:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > Could the problem be specific to certain firmware revisions on the
> > > cards?
> >
> > S
On Saturday 11 October 2008 13:52:50 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
> >>>
> >>> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL
On Saturday 11 October 2008 13:26:29 Adam McDougall wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
> >>
> >> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary J
On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> >
> > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
> > >
> > > Same hardware with
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 07:38:58AM +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > aac(4) - not affected
> > aha(4) - unknown
> > ahb(4) - unknown
> > ahc(4) - affected
> > ahd(4) - unknown; no one answered the OP's question in the thread
> > asr(4) - unknown
> > ips(4) - unknown
> > mpt(4) - not affected
> > mfi(4)
lto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Chadwick
> Sent: 11 October 2008 06:53 PM
> To: Adam McDougall
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: am2 MBs - 4g + SCSI wipes out root partition
>
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0400, Ad
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:32:13 +0100
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for not responding back in Jan. I have a hard time recommending
> > the 29320/39320 cards because of the long history they have with
> > incompatibilities with certain U320 drives. I don't think that the
>
> Out
> Sorry for not responding back in Jan. I have a hard time recommending
> the 29320/39320 cards because of the long history they have with
> incompatibilities with certain U320 drives. I don't think that the
Out of interest, what cards would you recommend ? I have just
started running 4 drives o
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:52:50 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[big snip]
Is your LSI SAS controller driven by mpt(4) or mfi(4)?
Let's break down what we know for sure at this point:
aac(4) - not affected
aha(4) - unknown
ahb(4) - unknown
ahc(4) - affected
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:52:50 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[big snip]
> Is your LSI SAS controller driven by mpt(4) or mfi(4)?
>
> Let's break down what we know for sure at this point:
>
> aac(4) - not affected
> aha(4) - unknown
> ahb(4) - unknown
> ahc(4) - affected
> ahd(4)
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:18 +0200
Fabian Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Jeremy
>
> On 11.10.08 18:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Could the problem be specific to certain firmware revisions on the
> > cards?
>
> Some other idea, which versions of FreeBSD/amd64 are affected?
> Only 8-CU
Hello Jeremy
On 11.10.08 18:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Could the problem be specific to certain firmware revisions on the
cards?
Some other idea, which versions of FreeBSD/amd64 are affected?
Only 8-CURRENT, or also 6.x- and/or 7.x-RELEASE?
As far as I have seen from the reports, it does on
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
>>> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary J
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:08:00 +0200 (CEST)
Jean-Marc Zucconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gary Jennejohn writes:
>
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
> >>
> >> Same hardware with SA
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> > > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
> > >
> >
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
> >
> > Same hardware with SATA works perfect
> >
> > Same hardware with scsi up to 3.5Gigs instal
> Gary Jennejohn writes:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
>>
>> Same hardware with SATA works perfect
>>
>> Same hardware with scsi up to 3.5Gigs installed works perfect
>>
>> what ca
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
>
> Same hardware with SATA works perfect
>
> Same hardware with scsi up to 3.5Gigs installed works perfect
>
> what calls my attention that all this MBs do not have the
On Friday 10 October 2008 07:43:07 Dieter wrote:
> > I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI
> > or=20 Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
> >
> > the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the
> > machi= ne=20
> > crashes, sometimes a pa
> I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI or=20
> Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
>
> the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the machi=
> ne=20
> crashes, sometimes a panic mmap ffs crossrefeerence or something, passes to=
> o=20
I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI or
Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the machine
crashes, sometimes a panic mmap ffs crossrefeerence or something, passes too
fast to look an when t
34 matches
Mail list logo
