On 2015-Dec-26, at 9:00 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 17:21 -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> In my view "-mno-unaligned-access" is an even bigger hammer than I
>> used. I find no clang statement about what its ABI consequences would
>> be, unlike for what I did: What mix of more padd
On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 17:21 -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> In my view "-mno-unaligned-access" is an even bigger hammer than I
> used. I find no clang statement about what its ABI consequences would
> be, unlike for what I did: What mix of more padding for alignment vs.
> more but smaller accesses? Bu
Thanks, it sounds like I fixed a bug, but there’s more.
What were the specific port so I can test it here?
And to be clear, this is a buildworld on the RPi 2 using the cross-built world
with CPUTYPE=armv7a or some such, right?
Warner
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 9:32 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> [I