On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 16:28, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 12:08 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 14:52, James Roman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2010 01:49 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:18, Rich Megginson
wrote:
>
> Dan Sc
On 10/08/2010 12:08 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 14:52, James Roman wrote:
On 10/08/2010 01:49 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:18, Rich Megginsonwrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman
wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman wrote:
So does anyone have any more suggestions? Or should I just configure a
new replica with new hostname and IP?
Thanks,
Dan
I've
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 14:52, James Roman wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 01:49 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman
wrote:
>> So does anyone have any more suggestions? Or
On 10/08/2010 01:49 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman wrote:
So does anyone have any more suggestions? Or should I just configure a
new replica with new hostname and IP?
Thanks,
Dan
I've s
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman wrote:
>>
So does anyone have any more suggestions? Or should I just configure a
new replica with new hostname and IP?
Thanks,
Dan
>>>
>>>
Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman wrote:
So does anyone have any more suggestions? Or should I just configure a
new replica with new hostname and IP?
Thanks,
Dan
I've seen the initial problem where the memberof elements stop updating on
my own FreeIPA v1 re
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:39, James Roman wrote:
>
>> So does anyone have any more suggestions? Or should I just configure a
>> new replica with new hostname and IP?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dan
>
> I've seen the initial problem where the memberof elements stop updating on
> my own FreeIPA v1 replica a
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:47, Dan Scott wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:32, James Roman wrote:
>> On 10/07/2010 11:20 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>
>>> 20 is "type or value exists" - I think this means that it is attempting to
>>> set a referral for the master, but there already is one.
On 10/06/2010 07:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 19:29, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 10/06/2010 03:08 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
Do any other groups have a "member"
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:32, James Roman wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 11:20 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>> 20 is "type or value exists" - I think this means that it is attempting to
>> set a referral for the master, but there already is one.
>>>
>>> Curie contains the same log entry.
>>>
>>> But, non
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:20:29 -0600
Rich Megginson wrote:
> >
> Does IPA have its own memberOf plugin, or is it using the one from
> 389?
In v1, it had its own memberof plugin.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
Freeipa-users mai
On 10/07/2010 11:20 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
20 is "type or value exists" - I think this means that it is
attempting to set a referral for the master, but there already is one.
Curie contains the same log entry.
But, none of the users contain the memberOf attributes on ohm.
Does IPA have its
Dan Scott wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:58, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:20, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:02, Rich Megginson
wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, O
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:58, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:20, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:02, Rich Megginson
wrote:
>
> Dan Scott wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:43:15 -0400
Dan Scott wrote:
> Sorry about that, I now get:
>
> adding new entry cn=memberOf_fixup_2010_10_7_10_41_11, cn=memberOf
> task, cn=tasks, cn=config
> ldap_add: Insufficient access
>
> I have an admin Kerberos ticket and I know the password is correct
> because o
Dan Scott wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:20, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:02, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 18:30, Rich Megginson
wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Ad
Sorry about that, I now get:
adding new entry cn=memberOf_fixup_2010_10_7_10_41_11, cn=memberOf
task, cn=tasks, cn=config
ldap_add: Insufficient access
I have an admin Kerberos ticket and I know the password is correct
because otherwise I get 'ldap_simple_bind: Invalid credentials'.
Thanks,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:20, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:02, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dan Scott wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 18:30, Rich Megginson
wrote:
>
> Dan Scott wrote:
>
>
>>>
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:02, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 18:30, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
The probl
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:02, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 18:30, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dan Scott wrote:
>>>
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
The pr
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 19:29, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 10/06/2010 03:08 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
Do any other groups have a "member" attribute that points to your
"c
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 18:30, Rich Megginson wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
The problem appears to be related to the users, rather than the
groups. None of the users on ohm ha
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 19:29, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 03:08 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
>> users, no nested groups.
>>
>
> Do any other groups have a "member" attribute that points to your
> "cn=admins" group's
On 10/06/2010 03:08 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
Do any other groups have a "member" attribute that points to your
"cn=admins" group's DN? The error message indicates that some other
group has your admin
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 18:30, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
>> users, no nested groups.
>>
>> The problem appears to be related to the users, rather than the
>> groups. None of the users on ohm have a 'memb
Dan Scott wrote:
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
The problem appears to be related to the users, rather than the
groups. None of the users on ohm have a 'memberOf'. Curie has the
correct memberOf attributes.
The error message spe
I'm not sure which group this is referring to. Admins only contains 3
users, no nested groups.
The problem appears to be related to the users, rather than the
groups. None of the users on ohm have a 'memberOf'. Curie has the
correct memberOf attributes.
The groups themselves appear to be correct
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
ohm_admins.ldif and curie_admins.ldif attached. I added a '-h
$hostname' to the command to ensure that I queried both servers. The
results look identical to me, apart from the ordering.
Thanks,
Dan
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
ohm_admins.ldif and curie_admins.ldif attached. I added a '-h
$hostname' to the command to ensure that I queried both servers. The
results look identical to me, apart from the ordering.
Thanks,
Dan
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On We
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:32, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:26:48 -0400
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
I have master and slave FreeIPA servers. I recently upgraded the slave
by wiping, re-installing Fedora 13 and re-creating the replication
using ipa-replica-prepare an
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:32, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:26:48 -0400
> Dan Scott wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have master and slave FreeIPA servers. I recently upgraded the slave
>> by wiping, re-installing Fedora 13 and re-creating the replication
>> using ipa-replica-prepare and
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:26:48 -0400
Dan Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have master and slave FreeIPA servers. I recently upgraded the slave
> by wiping, re-installing Fedora 13 and re-creating the replication
> using ipa-replica-prepare and ipa-replica-install.
>
> For some reason, the slave is having
33 matches
Mail list logo
