I wrote it becouse in Russia * is very popular. And it have g729.
I want to make popular FS in my country. We have not patent issues, but I more
like speex and celt - it's better in my opinion - 8 kHz is past century! It's
century of wb VoIP and not 8khz TDM! : )
Only for those who very need g
I am trying to implement a radius based solution
using FS. I have seen that the mod_radius_cdr module
is actively maintained. so I have a few questions/remarks :
1) When I place a call and my radius server is down, the
call blocks forever instead of just radius_timeout * radius_retries
seconds (I
Steve Underwood wrote:
Depends what you are after. Speex offers the quality of G.729 at around
the same processing load. However, nobody seems to want to pay for the
processing load of G.729. Almost everything uses G.729A. Half the
processing load, but significantly poorer quality.
VoIP is mo
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your prompt reply. We are currently using FreeSwitch rev 1.02.
As for OS, we are using CentOS 5.2.
We are using Java application to connect to MySQL database by JDBC APIs, the
issue we faced is that after many calls are made, the java application will
reflect the erro
Haha, I knew I'd seen it *somewhere*! ;)
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Nope its not valid.. tell Cisco this please! :P
>
> /b
>
--
Kristian Kielhofner
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.astlinux.org
http://www.star2star.com
_
Michael Collins wrote:
> If anyone figures this out please post it to this thread. I am working
> on a wiki page for the VMWare appliance and I would like to be able to
> inform people on how to handle this situation.
I had some issues under vmware fusion. They were resolved by adding
clock=pit [1
What rev? What OS? What exactly are you doing?
/b
On Jan 23, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Simon Leck wrote:
Hi All,
I am experiencing memory leak issue in FreeSwitch? Anybody knows
how this can be resolved, please email me.
Thanks in advance to everybody for your kind assistance.
Thanks
Simon
__
what's the bug number for this issue? if the answer is "there isn't
one", then please post one
-Ray
Simon Leck wrote:
Hi All,
I am experiencing memory leak issue in FreeSwitch? Anybody knows how
this can be resolved, please email me.
Thanks in advance to everybody for your kind a
Hi All,
I am experiencing memory leak issue in FreeSwitch? Anybody knows how this
can be resolved, please email me.
Thanks in advance to everybody for your kind assistance.
Thanks
Simon
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@li
Nope its not valid.. tell Cisco this please! :P
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> I don't think it's even
> valid to use "G.729a" or annexa in an SDP...
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.o
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Depends what you are after. Speex offers the quality of G.729 at around
> the same processing load. However, nobody seems to want to pay for the
> processing load of G.729. Almost everything uses G.729A. Half the
> processing load, but sign
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Michael S Collins wrote:
>> That delta shrinks as processing power gets cheaper. I wonder if g729
>> licenses will get cheaper over time as well? I wouldn't take that
>> bet. ;)
>>
> Economics 101: The pricing of the licences is directly re
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Michael S Collins
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Brian West wrote:
>>>
>>>
Not really what I would call a break... but at some point in the $1.6
mill
Michael S Collins wrote:
> That delta shrinks as processing power gets cheaper. I wonder if g729
> licenses will get cheaper over time as well? I wouldn't take that
> bet. ;)
>
Economics 101: The pricing of the licences is directly related to
G.729's lock on the market. The only reason for
makes me laugh... everyone else is racing to stay on 8k... I'm running
in the other direction! : )
16k, 32k and 48k voip... much better.
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Depends what you are after. Speex offers the quality of G.729 at
> around
> the same processing
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Michael S Collins
> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Brian West wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Not really what I would call a break... but at some point in the $1.6
>>> million range you stop paying.
>>>
>>> /b
>>>
>> Like I
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Kristian Kielhofner
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Michael S Collins
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Brian West wrote:
>>
>>> Not really what I would call a break... but at some point in the $1.6
>>> million range you stop paying.
>>>
>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Michael S Collins wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Brian West wrote:
>
>> Not really what I would call a break... but at some point in the $1.6
>> million range you stop paying.
>>
>> /b
>
> Like I said, OSS FTW baby!
> -MC
Quite the contrary.
If Speex
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Not really what I would call a break... but at some point in the $1.6
> million range you stop paying.
>
> /b
Like I said, OSS FTW baby!
-MC
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>
>>
>> Also remembers what happens to vol
Not really what I would call a break... but at some point in the $1.6
million range you stop paying.
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>
> Also remembers what happens to volume pricing. More of a break on
> licenses...
_
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Michael S Collins wrote:
>
> That delta shrinks as processing power gets cheaper. I wonder if g729
> licenses will get cheaper over time as well? I wouldn't take that
> bet. ;)
>
> -MC
Also remembers what happens to volume pricing. More of a break on licenses...
On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Michael Collins
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Brian West
>> wrote:
>>> Speex, while nice I think it would use more resources in some cases.
>>
>> True. Occasionally more resources, alw
Try this (update to svn trunk first)
then place your call as usual
then in foo.js
// dumps the event to text/plain
env = request.dumpENV("text");
// dumps the event to text/xml
xmlenv = request.dumpENV("xml");
// makes an XML obj from the xml text
xinfo = new XML("" + xmlenv + "");
// dump
Brian West wrote:
FreeSWITCHers,
I have started to put alternate config examples up for people to
check out. Right now it only has the Softphone example... if you have
ideas or examples to add to this please let me know:
i just added sbc, curl, and insideout config sets... all are pretty
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Michael Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Brian West wrote:
>> Speex, while nice I think it would use more resources in some cases.
>
> True. Occasionally more resources, always less licensing fees... ;)
> -MC
Less money on licensing, more money o
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Speex, while nice I think it would use more resources in some cases.
True. Occasionally more resources, always less licensing fees... ;)
-MC
>
> /b
>
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>
>>
>> Speex would be awesome but I
Speex, while nice I think it would use more resources in some cases.
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>
> Speex would be awesome but I'm not holding my breath
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.free
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Brian West wrote:
> They added iLBC.
>
> /b
>
Very true.
I wish I knew who got them to do that!
Speex would be awesome but I'm not holding my breath
--
Kristian Kielhofner
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.astlinux.org
http://ww
On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:11 PM, "Gregory Boehnlein" wrote:
You use it on your own risk
>>
>> Also, G.729 is patent encumbered big-time. Instead of lining the
>> pockets of lawyers and mega-corporations by perpetuating the use of a
>> crusty old codec we should all twist arms and get our provid
They added iLBC.
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
>
> Yeah.. let me know when you get Cisco to add Speex support to IOS! ;)
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/ma
> >> You use it on your own risk
>
> Also, G.729 is patent encumbered big-time. Instead of lining the
> pockets of lawyers and mega-corporations by perpetuating the use of a
> crusty old codec we should all twist arms and get our providers,
> device makers, etc. to use Speex.
Yeah.. let me know w
FreeSWITCHers,
I have started to put alternate config examples up for people to
check out. Right now it only has the Softphone example... if you have
ideas or examples to add to this please let me know:
http://svn.freeswitch.org/svn/configs/softphone/
Thanks,
Brian West
FreeSWITCH.or
I would use mod_limit and not futz with global anything.
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Mathieu Rene wrote:
> Its global_setvar not set_global
>
> Math
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.o
Its global_setvar not set_global
Math
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Scott Ellis wrote:
> The on answer is fine, the api_hangup_hook gets to the point where it
> wants to execute, but then nothing happens. Any thoughts?
>
>
> 2009-01-21 03:08:00 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1773
> switch_channel_
Hi,
Im trying to originate calls from a conference and use javascript to
watch out for hangup events so I can use the data in the session to
flesh out some database info. However it seems that Im having some
strangeness. It might just be my code. So I include that.
I run FreeSwitch Version 1.0.tr
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Raymond Chandler
wrote:
>
>> You use it on your own risk
Also, G.729 is patent encumbered big-time. Instead of lining the
pockets of lawyers and mega-corporations by perpetuating the use of a
crusty old codec we should all twist arms and get our providers,
device
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Helmut Kuper wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to get voicemail web interface up and running. I found that we
> need xml_rpc to open the 8080 port of FS. Then USer-profile needs
> "http-allowed-api=voicemail" parameter.
Start by knowing the exact domain of your directory domain (the name= in the
tag)
Lets say it's helmut.com and your ip is 1.2.3.4 and your extension is 1000
so if helmut.com is a real domain on the internet you could point the dns so
helmut.com points at FS
then you could go to
http://helmut.com
Chris Parker wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos
mailto:r...@kinetix.gr>> wrote:
I am trying to implement a radius based solution
using FS. I have seen that the mod_radius_cdr module
is actively maintained. so I have a few questions/remarks :
1) Whe
I use Sun's AU format to make ulaw raw files friendlier, you might find it
usefull.
2009/1/21 Brian West
> mod_sndfile already registered .ul and .al ;)
> /b
>
> On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:05 PM, freeswitch-us...@digitaldan.com wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> I'm new to this project so I'
mod_sndfile can record those too ;)
/b
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Guillaume Renaud wrote:
> I use Sun's AU format to make ulaw raw files friendlier, you might
> find it usefull.
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch
The reason I'd like to see the examples isn't so I can have a basic
voicemail or IVR app, but so I can extend an example with my own
complicated domain logic.
--Stephen
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Most if not all of this functionality is done with FreeSWITCH without
> an
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos
wrote:
> I am trying to implement a radius based solution
> using FS. I have seen that the mod_radius_cdr module
> is actively maintained. so I have a few questions/remarks :
>
> 1) When I place a call and my radius server is down, the
> ca
I am trying to implement a radius based solution
using FS. I have seen that the mod_radius_cdr module
is actively maintained. so I have a few questions/remarks :
1) When I place a call and my radius server is down, the
call blocks forever instead of just radius_timeout * radius_retries
seconds (I
You use it on your own risk
Actually, the fact that this is in this post at all SHOULD tell you NOT
to use it. Unless you have proper licensing for g.729, this is likely to
cause issues.
-Ray
begin:vcard
fn:intralanman
n:Chandler;Raymond
adr:;;630 Cooks Rd.;Farmville;VA;23901;United States
e
Helmut Kuper wrote:
http://fs.ip:8080/api/voicemail/web
This led to a web page generating out of web-vm.tpl with 0 (zero)
voicemails.
make sure that the voicemail is left for u...@ip rather than
u...@some.domain.name
If I call my voicebox to listen to the messages, there is
one new message av
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I tried to get voicemail web interface up and running. I found that we
need xml_rpc to open the 8080 port of FS. Then USer-profile needs
"http-allowed-api=voicemail" parameter. After that I left a message for
my account and tried to access my v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Steve,
wireshark decodes all things I needed to debug q931 and by now I haven't
found a bug compared to my commercial "aurora duet" q931 monitor device.
Well I spent some time to find a way in wireshark to get raw and pure
q931 data in, but I didn
If anyone want to play with it - http://freehg.org/u/deepwalker/fs_g729/
You use it on your own risk and compile it yourself.
If you want to develop it - write me.
I wrote it for russian community.
--
С уважением, Кривушин Михаил
Ведущий специалист отдела телекоммуникаций,
ООО "РН-Информ" фили
Daivd,
I think you missed part of his question.
You can easily choose not to answer an inbound call in FS by never
explicitly answering it.
you can call pre_answer instead or if you send the call to an app that
requires media it's pre_answered automatically.
pre_answer in FS terms is early media
There's a whole bunch of reasons why you might not want to answer an
inbound call:
- intercept messages (e.g. "the cellphone you've called is switched off")
- cost reduction on 1-800 calls, although you won't get a forward audio
path from the
caller until you do answer it
- in one case, a compa
Helmut Kuper wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> just an update about my progress in this.
>
> Currently I have working C code which creates a pcap file containing all
> needed protocoll headers in front of the Q931 dump. I use libpcap to
> create the pcap file.
Thanks Anthony,
There are some toll-free numbers I need to configure such that, originator
does not need to charge to its users, even though they are answered on
terminator side.
Anthony Minessale-2 wrote:
>
> You can't.
>
> Why would you need that? Are you trying to forward inbound calls
You could write something in JS or lua that would check local numbers
against a DB then forward them out if not (transfer) or send them to the
local extension processor
> From: Helmut Kuper
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:05:15 +0100
> To:
> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Dialplan Quest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
is there a dialan or dptool function, which allows to check whether a
user/extension is local or not ?
What I try to do is this:
Local extension? -> bridge -> bridge fails (on_busy, no answere,
timeout, offline)->voicemail
Every other call s
55 matches
Mail list logo
