On Thu 2016-09-08 08:04 , Donald R Laster Jr wrote:
> I use it on Slackware, where it is part of the distribution,
> and RHEL where I have to install it.
It's in EPEL, so it's kind of part of the RHEL/CENTOS distro too:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
your thumb.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, Robert Crochelt wrote:
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:48:03 -0600
From: Robert Crochelt <bob99...@yahoo.com>
To: Bob Marcan <bob.mar...@gmail.com>
Cc: gi1242+f...@gmail.com, fvwm@fvwm.org
Subject: Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition
Totally agree. My favorite wm of
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:27 AM, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Werner Scheinast wrote:
>
>> FVWM has shrunk down to a - as you call it - crackpot project. Only few
>> people are using it, these are mainly old guys like me (I'm 45) who know
>
> Well
Apologies for "hijacking" this thread; I love fvwm and use it every day.
I have to confess that a small part of me fears that because of a silly
protocol change, fvwm may suddenly "not work", and the fvwm dev(s) might
no longer be interested...
Regardless, let me also add my BIG THANK YOU to the
Heute schrieb Thomas Adam:
> I have no idea why some people hijacked this thread with ridiculous statements
> of ensuring FVWM doesn't disappear, etc. It's on Github along with all the
> other crackpot projects...
Dear Thomas,
FVWM has shrunk down to a - as you call it - crackpot project. Only
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:50:36PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered
> if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the
> early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
>
> If so, send some
Me too.
As long as nobody takes the functionality away from FVWM,
the logo doesn't matter.
- Michael -
Robert Crochelt wrote:
> Totally agree. My favorite wm of all time.
> Bob Crochelt
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 1, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Bob Marcan wrote:
>>
>>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> While searching for a link to this xpm, I discovered that debians
> control file of package fvwm-icons mentions an upstream source which is
> nowadays 404 [0]. What happend to fvwm-icons?
I dropped it from FVWM since it wasn't
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered
> if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the
> early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
Personally, I'd say no.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Martin Cermak wrote:
> I like the current logo. But as long as fvwm is here as such, I'm
> fine with pretty much any logo for it ;)
Ditto; The logo can be a green polka dotted rabbit if you fancy. Just as
long as fvwm doesn't disappear...
GI
--
TEN
Hi Thomas,
On Mon 2016-08-29 21:50 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered
> if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the
> early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
>
> If so, send some
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 21:50:36 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and
> wondered if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition
> was held in the early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
>
> If so, send some ideas
12 matches
Mail list logo