2009/2/17 Bob Woodside :
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>> Yes. I just don't have enough time to take care of all the
>> patches. I think you should have commit privileges for CVS to
>> speed things up. Changes in behaviour should be discussed in
>> advance anyway.
>>
>> Any
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Yes. I just don't have enough time to take care of all the
> patches. I think you should have commit privileges for CVS to
> speed things up. Changes in behaviour should be discussed in
> advance anyway.
>
> Any other opinions?
Agreed.
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:00:53PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Yes. I just don't have enough time to take care of all the
> patches. I think you should have commit privileges for CVS to
> speed things up. Changes in behaviour should be discussed in
> advance anyway.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:00:53PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> When the old UnderMousePlacement style got folded in to
> PositionPlacement, if the window or part of it was going to be placed
> off-screen, then the window was forced on-screen. Given that
> "PositionPlacement UnderMouse" just equate
Hi,
When the old UnderMousePlacement style got folded in to
PositionPlacement, if the window or part of it was going to be placed
off-screen, then the window was forced on-screen. Given that
"PositionPlacement UnderMouse" just equates to "m-50w m-50w", it's
technically possible to fudge this just