Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/06/2007 15:06:48:
> On 6/18/2007 1:26 PM, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
>
> > these 3 are actually not so simple... the main thing that's blocking 2
of
> > them right now is that they need support for stores with gaps, which
can be
> > added except the other pro
On 6/18/2007 1:26 PM, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
these 3 are actually not so simple... the main thing that's blocking 2 of
them right now is that they need support for stores with gaps, which can be
added except the other problem is that the vectorizer thinks it's not
profitable to vectorize them (or r
Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/06/2007 20:43:15:
> Hi Dorit,
>
> some years ago I posted these testcases to Bugzilla's GCC:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439
>
>
Hi Dorit,
some years ago I posted these testcases to Bugzilla's GCC:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439
It looks like none of those are vectorized as of GCC 4.3. I read today that