--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22 11:51
---
Working on a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark
The following code (from
http://home.comcast.net/~kmbtib/gfortran_bugs/REF_JVB_GFTN_005.html) fails in
the following way (on i686-mingw and powerpc-apple-darwin):
-
module funcs
implicit none
contains
function f(x)
character(*), intent(in) :: x
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-01-22 11:34
---
Should patch to sse_comparison_operator
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01087.html) be reverted in this
case? It didn't fix the problem, and according to comment #9 the problem is not
in this area.
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22
10:36 ---
The code generated looks correct to me.
The generated assembler that you've give for __cos is clearly saving and
restoring f4-f7.
__cos:
// Saves the integer registers
ca4c: e92d4070stmdb
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22
10:04 ---
Combine ought to merge these two
(insn 13 11 14 1 (parallel [
(set (reg:QI 60)
(and:QI (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 59 [ v ]) 0)
(const_int 3 [0x3])))
(cl
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||dannysmith at users dot
||sourceforge dot net
http://gcc.gnu.or
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-22 09:16
---
Ok..
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resol
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo