http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-24
07:44:15 UTC ---
> How do I report it to AdaCore? Their web site has lots of marketing stuff but
> nothing about reporting bugs. Ditto for the Libre site.
See the 'Contact' menu on the Libre site.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24
07:24:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 24 07:24:34 2012
New Revision: 183468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183468
Log:
PR target/51957
* target.def (const_not_ok_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-01-24
07:05:03 UTC ---
Thanks, Markus, Jakub.
Despite I don't understand this patch, it patch seems to work for me :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #4 from Gary Barnes 2012-01-24
06:05:59 UTC ---
How do I report it to AdaCore? Their web site has lots of marketing stuff but
nothing about reporting bugs. Ditto for the Libre site.
So there are two GNAT's in the world? Do they ev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #19 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-24 05:14:00 UTC ---
../gcchead/configure --enable-64-bit-bfd --disable-static --enable-shared
--enable-debug --disable-sim --enable-gold --enable-plugins --disable-werror
--with-separate-debug-dir=/usr/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #18 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-24
05:07:58 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-24
02:45:28 UTC ---
cdecl only applies to the 32-bit ABI. ix86_handle_cconv_attribute normally
warns about using it in 64-bit mode, I wonder why it doesn't on darwin?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24
01:30:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I cannot reproduce this bug on the trunk or 4.6.
I want to say this is really a dup of bug 44174.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24
01:27:30 UTC ---
I cannot reproduce this bug on the trunk or 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, wrong-code
Component|boot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|[regression][C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975
--- Comment #1 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24 00:55:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26439
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26439
Proposed fix.
Here is just the patch if you want to take a quick look at it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975
Bug #: 51975
Summary: ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with
fprofile-use when source changes from
fprofile-generate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51030
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-23
23:44:11 UTC ---
*** Bug 42635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42635
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19774
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
--- Comment #7 from Sandra Loosemore
2012-01-23 23:14:18 UTC ---
In addition to specifying an explicit command-line option, I think that if you
configure GCC with --with-demangler-in-ld=no it'll restore the previous
behavior, at least on systems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #17 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-23
23:12:07 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Jan 23 23:12:01 2012
New Revision: 183457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183457
Log:
2012-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
--- Comment #6 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2012-01-23 22:46:47 UTC ---
I will check this patch tomorrow (Jan 24th) to make sure that it fixes the
problem on non-reduced test cases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #16 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-23
22:21:53 UTC ---
Well I tried to just use the generated Makefile rules to hack together a
solution for --disable-static using the convenience libraries
My plan was to generate a libstdc++convenien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-23 22:05:44 UTC ---
> g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C: Limit to x86.
>
> -/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* && ilp32 } } } */
Any reason to limit the test to i?86 and 32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
20:48:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:48:31 2012
New Revision: 183455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183455
Log:
PR c++/51930
* decl2.c (determine_visibilit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz 2012-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-23
20:38:27 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:38:23 2012
New Revision: 183453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183453
Log:
2012-01-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51726
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-01-23 20:22:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26437
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26437
Patch (not tested)
Hi, not sure if this is a bug or not, but not quite sure where else to turn.
Using Red Hat EL 5.7 (IA64), GCC 4.1.2
uname -a: Linux [Hostname] 2.6.18-274.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 8 17:41:07 EDT 2011
ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
gcc --version: gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51)
When compiling a s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2012-01-23 19:55:40
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Jan 23 19:55:35 2012
New Revision: 183450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183450
Log:
PR target/51900
* config/i386/predicates.md (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab 2012-01-23 19:51:48
UTC ---
Reduced testcase, to be compiled with -O -fnon-call-exceptions.
int f (float g)
{
try { return g >= 0; }
catch (...) {}
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett 2012-01-23 19:16:12 UTC
---
As I mentioned in the other bug, the specific optimization from -O3 that
triggers this if -fipa-cp-clone.
Is there a reason these patches haven't been applied? Bootstrapping the
compil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51974
Bug #: 51974
Summary: GCC fails to bootstrap with --enable-checking=release
on opensuse
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51958
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51223
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51922
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2012-01-23
18:31:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26436
proposed patch
I'll run this through a cross-build first, but I expect this will fix it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-01-23 18:21:14 UTC ---
The following patch (applied to 4.6) fixes the problem for me:
diff --git a/gcc/gengtype.c b/gcc/gengtype.c
index abf17f8..550d3bb 100644
--- a/gcc/gengtype.c
+++ b/gcc/gengtype
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973
Bug #: 51973
Summary: [regression][C++0x] Template parameter deduction fails
for overloaded functions when template parameters have
defaulted arguments
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
18:05:01 UTC ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01160.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-23 17:59:56 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:59:51 2012
New Revision: 183446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183446
Log:
2012-01-23 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51398
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51398
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-23 17:56:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:56:42 2012
New Revision: 183445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183445
Log:
/cp
2012-01-23 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51970
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bur...@net-b.de |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-23
17:37:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Otherwise, as far as I could see, all Fortran examples work except for
> - chapter07/strategy_surrogate_f2003: Segfaults in
> __timed_lorenz_module_MOD___
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
--- Comment #1 from Eric Batut 2012-01-23
17:36:50 UTC ---
Adding Richard Henderson, who committed rev 183051.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972
Bug #: 51972
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE misses memset/calloc, causing segfault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51971
Bug #: 51971
Summary: unclear/unverified restrictions on
attribute((const|pure))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51970
Bug #: 51970
Summary: gimplification failed for an avatar of pr51948
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51941
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51941
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-01-23
17:05:53 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:05:46 2012
New Revision: 183441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183441
Log:
PR testsuite/51941 - FAIL g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51398
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
Bug #: 51969
Summary: [4.7 regression] gcc 4.7 unable to build gcc 4.6
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
ead model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20120123 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-c' '-mandroid' '-mbionic'
'-Wno-unused-function' '-Wno-psabi' '-march=armv7-a' '-mcpu=cortex-a9'
'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
16:35:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 23 16:35:31 2012
New Revision: 183438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183438
Log:
PR c++/51925
* class.c (add_method): Set OV
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51966
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Version|4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-23
15:58:01 UTC ---
I bet you'd have to instantiate the template to see the errors.
Nevertheless, it would be a bad idea to add __attribute__((format)) to the
testcase and expect that we don't error on t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-23 15:50:16 UTC ---
> g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C: Limit to x86.
Note that using 'format' instead of 'cdecl' hangs also on
powerpc-apple-darwin9:
[karma] f90/bug% time g++-fsf-4.6 pr51344_db.C
^C0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-23 15:47:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> The problem with testing for duplicate diagnostics is by now well known, I
> guess. What I couldn't figure out from the audit trail was whether the fix
> its
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-23
15:39:52 UTC ---
do the printers ever work, outside the testsuite?
i.e. if you build this:
#include
int main() {
std::tuple t;
return std::tuple_size::value;
}
then debug and run
break 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-23
15:30:25 UTC ---
The problem with testing for duplicate diagnostics is by now well known, I
guess. What I couldn't figure out from the audit trail was whether the fix
itself was ready to go in or not,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
15:30:58 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 23 15:30:48 2012
New Revision: 183436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183436
Log:
PR target/51934
* g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-23
15:26:34 UTC ---
Indeed, I double checked that *before* changing the functions to use moves we
had plain copies, that is the original HP/SGI functions had copies, nothing was
passed by reference. Thus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26391|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-01-23
15:20:35 UTC ---
Similar fail is libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc:
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/test/gnu/gcc
/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-23 15:19:37 UTC ---
> Well, if it hangs before the fix with the noreturn attribute, then it is
> trivial to replace the return a; with for (;;);
It does not hang:
macbook] f90/bug% cat pr51344_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
Bug #: 51967
Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51966
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-23
15:10:42 UTC ---
Well, if it hangs before the fix with the noreturn attribute, then it is
trivial to replace the return a; with for (;;);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51966
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51830
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51830
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23 14:57:50 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 23 14:57:44 2012
New Revision: 183435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183435
Log:
PR libitm/51830
* builtin-types.def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-23 14:55:08 UTC ---
> Log:
> PR target/51934
> * g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C: Use noreturn instead of cdecl.
>
> Should be fixed now.
The use of 'noreturn' yields a warning with g++ 4.6.2 an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51966
--- Comment #1 from Peter Wind 2012-01-23
14:51:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26431
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26431
compile with gfortran fails
small code that exposes the same problem (internal compiler error)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
14:43:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 23 14:43:25 2012
New Revision: 183434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183434
Log:
PR target/51934
* g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-23
14:11:08 UTC ---
Thanks, Chris.
I haven't looked at the patch or test yet, but I'm a little surprised the
compiler can't elide the move constructors.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23 14:10:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 26430
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26430
Tentative patch
2012-01-23 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/51879
tree-ssa-scc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-23
14:07:49 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Jan 23 14:07:41 2012
New Revision: 183433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183433
Log:
PR lto/51916
* lto-wrapper.c (run_
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
