https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78579
Bug ID: 78579
Summary: redundant instruction of the form cmp r0, r0 generated
in assembly with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 29 07:48:43 2016
New Revision: 242953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-29 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/78546
* ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
>
> --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> Maybe it is an option to be less strict? I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78578
--- Comment #2 from zengxiaoqing ---
Program Main
implicit none
integer :: ins
type str
character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr(:)
end type
type(str) ::tstr
allocate(character(len=20)::tstr%CStr(20))
tstr%CStr(1) = "20"
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this needs at least:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02837.html
And a few more match.pd changes to fully replace conditional_replacement. I
hope to be able to get a full patch for the ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 29 05:29:47 2016
New Revision: 242949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Make deallocation of a large frame work (PR77687)
If we use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78578
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78578
Bug ID: 78578
Summary: character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
--- Comment #4 from mecej4 at operamail dot com ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> We cannot address the Windows(+Cygwin,Mingw,etc.) issues which have more to
> do with the OS related layers I assume.
>
> I will see what I get on C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 29 02:02:45 2016
New Revision: 242947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Make code after a new trap unreachable (PR78342)
Combine c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 40185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40185&action=edit
The start of the patch
Note this is just a start of the rewrite. It needs improvement as it started
out really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78577
Bug ID: 78577
Summary: Fix define_insn operand types for vexturhlx,
vexturhrx, vextuwlx, and vextuwrx patterns
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wtype-limits warning|[4.5 Regression]
|regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78574
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097
Chris Johns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrisj at rtems dot org
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78573
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why do you think this isn't a lack of accuracy? Floating to integer always
truncates.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78570
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why do you think 27 is wrong?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
The conversion is done by __fixtfdi in libgcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576
Bug ID: 78576
Summary: [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71331
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 28 22:51:29 2016
New Revision: 242937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78540
* rtl.h (remove_reg_equal_equiv_notes)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Breno Leitao from comment #7)
> Created attachment 40182 [details]
> gcc dump with pre processed file
Ok, this on I have recreated. I'll dig into it.
-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-242931-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20161128 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisions:
trunk r242931 - FAIL
6-branch r242029 - OK
7.0.0 20161128 (experimental) [trunk revision 242906] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
gcc-trunk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$
$ cat s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78520
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78521
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78520
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Nov 28 21:41:41 2016
New Revision: 242935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78521 - [7 Regression] incorrect byte count in -Wformat-leng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78521
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Nov 28 21:41:41 2016
New Revision: 242935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78521 - [7 Regression] incorrect byte count in -Wformat-leng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74748
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74748
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Nov 28 21:30:40 2016
New Revision: 242934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR gcc/74748
* libgcc/config/bfin/libgcc-glibc.ver, libgcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74748
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Nov 28 21:27:47 2016
New Revision: 242933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR gcc/74748
* libgcc/mkmap-symver.awk: add support for ski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE on |[6 Regression] ICE on valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Seems to resemble:
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1019
"0001019: strndup shouldn't require source array to be null-terminated"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40183&action=edit
revert part of r242745 for strcat, strcat_chk, strncat, strncat_chk
Hi,
Unfortunately I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71293
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
From old logs it appears these started working back in June sometime
Regressions on trunk (power8) at revision 237314 vs revision 237309
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-2.c -fplugin=./must_tail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #7 from Breno Leitao ---
Created attachment 40182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40182&action=edit
gcc dump with pre processed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Breno Leitao from comment #5)
> I can reproduce this (or a very similar version of this) bug on my system.
>
> I am seeing this failure when compiling package yadifa-2.2.2 on Debian
> testing w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78573
Bug ID: 78573
Summary: ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13405
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571
Bug ID: 78571
Summary: ICE in create_character_initializer, at
fortran/data.c:191
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572
Bug ID: 78572
Summary: internal compiler error: in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78570
Bug ID: 78570
Summary: ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:494
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Breno Leitao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brenohl at br dot ibm.com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.0 |7.0
--- Comment #6 from Gerhard Stei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is also the same issue as PR 78498.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 28 19:20:02 2016
New Revision: 242930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72808
* decl.c (finish_enum_value_list): Call fixup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 28 19:15:51 2016
New Revision: 242929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/78546
* simplify-rtx.c (neg_const_int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
that was binutils 2.27.51.20161124, and the Debian GCC version (unstable),
configured with
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 6.2.1-5ubuntu1'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78512
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I wonder if we just need to bite the bullet and decide that %p is too system
dependent, particularly when performing optimization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Maybe it is an option to be less strict? In the test case, both function name
and asm name (libname) are in the namespace of the implementation: both start
with 2 underscores. The function name even star
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78556
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78556
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Mon Nov 28 18:33:19 2016
New Revision: 242928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR78556 - left shift of negative values
Running bootstrap-ub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 28 17:31:37 2016
New Revision: 242926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/78298
* tree-nested.c (convert_local_reference_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
I cannot recreate this using r242827 of the FSF 6 branch. What configure
options are you using? ...and in case it makes a difference (it can), what
binutils version?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78169
--- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I just tried reproducing the earlier bug with my gcc build and failed to get
the ICE, so I assume this is a different problem despite also getting "internal
compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> Yes, using aliases would be a good workaround.
hmmm, for libgcc functions written in asm this is easy enough, like
.global func1_alias
.global func1
fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78504
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
Bug ID: 78569
Summary: "internal compiler error: in
get_substring_ranges_for_loc" processing sprintf
buffer overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Bug ID: 78568
Summary: Wtype-limits warning regression
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 28 15:21:53 2016
New Revision: 242924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77591
* typeck.c (maybe_warn_about_returning_addres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567
--- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz ---
Also happens on a fresh configure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |6.3
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 28 15:03:55 2016
New Revision: 242920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/78542
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
oss_01 is "good" with zero size until the string is emitted.
.good: 1 .fail: 0
size: 0
oss_01 << str_01;
.good: 0 .fail: 1
size: 33554432
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567
Bug ID: 78567
Summary: GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71848
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
>
> --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> IIUC it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Thanks for looking into it.
IIUC it's a backend issue.
config/avr/builtins.def sets library names for some built-ins, and some
libnames are the same because the libgcc asm code is exactly the same, even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
>
> --- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka ---
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
--- Comment #2 from mecej4 at operamail dot com ---
Thanks, Martin. After posting, I found that I could add more add more
attachments, but I was a bit worried that, as in other forums, the initial post
could not be edited or modified.
I presume t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Therefore the comment should be
> /* CST1 - (CST2 - A) -> (CST1 - CST2) - A */
> rather than
> /* CST - (CST - A) -> CST - A */
How comes it is not "CST1 - (C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Bug ID: 78566
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc].c
regressions on Arm and m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo