https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85366
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
For GCC 7.3 on aarch64:
;; _23 = n_26 % i_30;
(insn 83 76 84 (set (reg:SI 142)
(udiv:SI (reg/v:SI 117 [ n ])
(reg/v:SI 115 [ i ]))) "t88.c":6 -1
(nil))
(insn 84 83 85 (set (reg:SI 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85366
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
For arm64, it is obvious why it is not optimized into one divide:
.L2:
udivw2, w0, w3
msubw2, w2, w3, w0
cbnzw2, .L5
sdivw2, w0, w3
.p2align 2
.L4:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71235
Mikhail Vorobyov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.vorobyov at cs dot msu.ru
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.1.0 |7.2.0
--- Comment #17 from k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85293
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85293
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat Apr 14 21:13:20 2018
New Revision: 259386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Disable -m[no-]direct-move (PR85293)
The -mno-direct-move o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 81773, which changed state.
Bug 81773 Summary: [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect
caf_get_by_ref() call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85397
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 85399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85399
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 85399, which changed state.
Bug 85399 Summary: Redundant SSP clearing before rdssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85399
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85404
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Apr 14 14:45:59 2018
New Revision: 259385
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259385&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-04-14 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Apr 14 14:45:59 2018
New Revision: 259385
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259385&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-04-14 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85404
Bug ID: 85404
Summary: -fcf-protection -mcet doesn't work with
-fleading-underscore
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85364
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> If it is about variables in MAIN__ and not say variables inside of BLOCK
> inside of MAIN__, then perhaps. For BLOCK, I wonder about stuff like:
> !$omp parall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85387
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85387
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Apr 14 13:38:41 2018
New Revision: 259384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85387
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85403
Bug ID: 85403
Summary: internal compiler error: ... config/i386/i386.c:32347
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42947
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 43931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43931&action=edit
0001-gcc-config.gcc-sh-Disable-sysroot-suffix-PR42947.patch
0001-gcc-config.gcc-sh-Disable-sysroot-suffix-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42947
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I have looked at it a bit and I think the bug here is in interaction between
MULTILIB_DEFAULTS
and
SYSROOT_SUFFIX_SPEC
AFAIU normally gcc ignores spec overrides for MULTILIB_DEFAULTS.
In our ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85387
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61152
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9)
> There have been a bunch of commits for this bug; is it fixed yet?
Dunno, back then I focused only on two targets, namely ARM and V850. Neither
did I perform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Sorry for overlooking the PR83983, I can help you with that next week.
> Now I've got reduced 1/6 of preprocessed files. Hope that having a
> reasonable small test-case would allow you do debug that and fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85401
--- Comment #1 from coypu ---
Threw computing resources at the problem, so now I have an "offending" commit.
Before this commit, it doesn't segfault.
After, it does.
commit bbb9b536dd58015b5712a867954d34aae9d9dae5 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85402
Bug ID: 85402
Summary: excessive compile time with -Wmissing-braces
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
28 matches
Mail list logo
