https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83693
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 83693, which changed state.
Bug 83693 Summary: missing strlen optimization for array of arrays
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83693
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83868
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> > output_indirect_thunk_function and ix86_code_end should be generated
> > the way in which normal thunks are output from middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83868
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> output_indirect_thunk_function and ix86_code_end should be generated
> the way in which normal thunks are output from middle-end.
Which way is that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I wouldn't be surprised if the build fails with -Wnarrowing (but maybe that
> should be fixed anyway, so we can build with non-GNU compilers that default
> to C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #13)
> Well it's more that you're doing- at any rate, the issue you've noted is
> easily bypassed by changing the "reinterpret_cast(__first)" to
> "reinterpret_cast(&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #16)
> Yup - arguably it would be nice to have an overload for vector iterators
> that does the same thing.
We already handle that, see the __niter_base functions wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #16 from Matt Bentley ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15)
> Look at how this exact problem is already solved elsewhere in the same file.
> All the algorithms that dispatch to a __builtin_memxxx function use similar
> t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #14)
> (In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> > > Also you're doing a reinterpret_cast from an arbitrary ite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184
--- Comment #7 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 23:35:39 2018
New Revision: 262759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414
--- Comment #1 from Carl Love ---
Author: carll
Date: Mon Jul 16 23:35:25 2018
New Revision: 262758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-07-16 Carl Love
Forgot the PR number on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #14 from Matt Bentley ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> > Also you're doing a reinterpret_cast from an arbitrary iterator type, which
> > is not necessarily a pointer, o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86520
--- Comment #6 from Stephen Warren ---
> Note that library code also assumes that misaligned accesses are safe:
> that is the default for AArch64.
I assume you're talking about gcc's default, not any architectural default? The
ARMv8 ARM states t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #13 from Matt Bentley ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> Also you're doing a reinterpret_cast from an arbitrary iterator type, which
> is not necessarily a pointer, or even a random access iterator.
>
> Since you do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #5 from Qing Zhao ---
> --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> I also just tried it on gcc110 and indeed it does not fail there. However, it
> does fail on gcc112.
thanks a lot. will try on gcc112.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86325
--- Comment #4 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 22:25:54 2018
New Revision: 262751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83183
--- Comment #5 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 22:25:54 2018
New Revision: 262751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86417
--- Comment #17 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 22:25:54 2018
New Revision: 262751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #2 from Curtis Hamilton ---
Created attachment 44402
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44402&action=edit
Requested generated file
I cannot find a definition for 'cmsghdr' in any header file. The only
reference I s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I also just tried it on gcc110 and indeed it does not fail there. However, it
does fail on gcc112.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81283
Alexander von Gluck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 16 21:25:22 2018
New Revision: 262750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86526
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184
--- Comment #6 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 20:55:32 2018
New Revision: 262748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/
Hi,
I just wanted to check if you would be interested in a list of Managed
Service Providers (MSPs) and Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs)?
We also have the data intelligence of:
• Managed Service Providers (MSP’s) – 25,000 unique companies
• Managed Security Service Prov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184
--- Comment #5 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 19:10:39 2018
New Revision: 262747
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262747&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83183
--- Comment #4 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 18:59:44 2018
New Revision: 262746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
Backport r262442 and r262743.
gcc/fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86417
--- Comment #16 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 18:59:44 2018
New Revision: 262746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
Backport r262442 and r262743.
gcc/for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86325
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 18:59:44 2018
New Revision: 262746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
Backport r262442 and r262743.
gcc/fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 82865, which changed state.
Bug 82865 Summary: Option -fdec collides with PDT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86325
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83183
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86541
Bug ID: 86541
Summary: Use SSE to emulate __attribute__((vector_size(8)))
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86417
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 18:24:50 2018
New Revision: 262744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
Fix handling of invalid assumed-shape/size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
FYI the patch for pr85528 does not contain the hunk from comment #3
I think it is probably more restrictive than necessary.
Happy hacking!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86417
--- Comment #14 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Jul 16 18:16:00 2018
New Revision: 262743
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262743&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Fritz Reese
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 86528, which changed state.
Bug 86528 Summary: [9 Regression] strlen of constant string malfunction -- had
to back out fix for PR middle-end/77357
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Mon Jul 16 18:03:15 2018
New Revision: 262742
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262742&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2018-07-16 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/86528
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 16 17:13:41 2018
New Revision: 262739
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86537 remove less> partial specialization
The standard does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86540
Bug ID: 86540
Summary: pr77445-2.c and ssa-dom-thread-7.c regressions since
May 20, 2018
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86539
Bug ID: 86539
Summary: OpenMP wrong-code with taskloop and references
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: midd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Hi Martin,
how about:
--- gcc/expr.c.jj 2018-07-09 22:33:48.0 +0200
+++ gcc/expr.c 2018-07-16 17:18:47.919177047 +0200
@@ -11359,6 +11359,9 @@ string_constant (tree arg, tree *ptr_off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> My best guess is that you've messed up your GCC installation, because
> _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR should be defined in like so:
>
> #ifndef _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #3 from Qing Zhao ---
> --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> What system are you testing on? I've seen the same failure on power 8 and
> power 9 LE systems and power 7 and power 8 BE systems.
I am using the GCC farm m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The changes from lwg 1262 were implemented by r171293 but we never got rid of
the partial specialization of std::less.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
Bug ID: 86538
Summary: GCC should define a macro to specify if LSE is enabled
or not
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
--- Comment #2 from rpirrera at aitek dot it ---
Any news on the fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My best guess is that you've messed up your GCC installation, because
_GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR should be defined in like so:
#ifndef _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
# if __cplusplus > 201703L
# define _GLIBCXX20_CONSTE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Can you attach a copy of the generated file gen-sysinfo.go?
What does the definition of, say, cmsghdr look like in (or some
header file included by that one)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86520
Stephen Warren changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Warre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86526
--- Comment #4 from Qing Zhao ---
> On Jul 16, 2018, at 5:01 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> As the patch contains a lot of formatting fixes (Qing, please watch out
> formatting of your patches m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What system are you testing on? I've seen the same failure on power 8 and
power 9 LE systems and power 7 and power 8 BE systems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86537
Bug ID: 86537
Summary: std::less specialization for std::shared_ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86511
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jul 16 15:11:57 2018
New Revision: 262736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86511
* expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86536
Bug ID: 86536
Summary: Function "returned NAN %" for a simple program which
forks
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
Bug ID: 86535
Summary: FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for
gcc 7.3.0 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86534
Bug ID: 86534
Summary: Linking gcc with gold fails, when libisl is under
/usr/local/lib
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86533
Bug ID: 86533
Summary: [9.0 regression] Compile error on valid code: error:
no matching function for call to
'std::allocator::allocator(const
_Tp_alloc_type&)'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
Yep, that's correct: -Wno-narrowing is necessary for build to succeed at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I wouldn't be surprised if the build fails with -Wnarrowing (but maybe that
should be fixed anyway, so we can build with non-GNU compilers that default to
C++11 or later).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
--- Comment #5 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86436
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 13:57:32 2018
New Revision: 262696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
PR lto/86523
* dwarf2out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Created attachment 44399 [details]
> patch
>
> The attached fixes the ICE. Martin, this was likely reduced from sth else?
> I guess nobody uses -gdwarf-5 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86529
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86529
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jul 16 13:33:23 2018
New Revision: 262695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert one more symbol_summary::get to ::get_create (PR ipa/86529).
2018-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so we populate debug_line_str_hash via dwarf2out_early_finish LTO debug
output
#0 output_line_string (form=DW_FORM_line_strp,
str=0x7fffeb19 "/abuild/rguenther/obj-sccvn-g/gcc",
entry_kin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86040
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:57:10 2018
New Revision: 262691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:57:10 2018
New Revision: 262691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86457
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:57:10 2018
New Revision: 262691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532
Bug ID: 86532
Summary: [9 Regression] Wrong code due to a wrong strlen
folding starting with r262522
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 16 11:01:48 2018
New Revision: 262690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-16 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo